Printed from

Music execs pin blame on Jobs for DRM

updated 03:45 pm EST, Thu March 1, 2007

Music Execs Blame Jobs

Apple CEO Steve Jobs' attempt to call for the removal of DRM has backfired, according to reactions by panel members at a conference yesterday. Speaking at the Digital Music Forum East conference, multiple participants in the discussion specifically critized the Apple executive's open letter, calling it a "red herring" that distracted from the real issue of Apple's FairPlay copy protection shutting out other stores and device makers.

"I don't think anybody is necessarily down on Apple," said Ruckus music store chief Mike Bebel. "The problem is the proprietary implementation of technology... and it's causing everybody else who is participating in the marketplace -- the other service providers, the labels, the users -- a lot of pain. If they could simply open it up, everybody would love them."

The director of music consulting at TAG Strategic, Ted Cohen, echoed sentiments by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and challenged Jobs to prove his sincerity by releasing Disney movies without FairPlay restrictions in place. The Apple leader holds the most shares of any individual stakeholder involved with the entertainment company.

Those who supported DRM also contradicted Jobs and said that at least some form of digital rights management was needed. Sony-BMG senior VP Thomas Gewecke said that his music label was aware of the problems caused by DRM and was actively searching for a technical solution that would please both sides.

Nonetheless, at least one critic held to his position. Greg Scholl, who runs music label The Orchard, flatly stated that neither Gewecke nor Jobs' positions could hold given their damaging effect on the user experience.

"The idea that DRM gives us choice isn't right," Scholl asserted. [via CNET]

By Electronista Staff
Post tools:




  1. jnicholas

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2002



    Did these guys just say there is nothing wrong with DRM that interferes with what we want to do with media, only with DRM that interferes with what they want to do?

  1. horvatic

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2002


    Record labels required DR

    Record labels required DRM. Not jobs fault at all as he didn't ask for DRM they shoved it down his throat. Nice try but trying to switch the blame isn't going to fly with any users. DRM is meant to block pirates yet they are the least effected by DRM. Only paying customers suffer with it, no one else. DRM is the recording industries fault solely period.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Apple 13-inch MacBook Pro (Early 2015)

Although the new darling of the Apple MacBook line up is the all-new MacBook, Apple has given its popular 13-inch MacBook Pro with Ret ...

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...

Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 (Android, 10.1-inch)

Lenovo is building a bigger name for itself year after year, including its devices expanding beyond desktop computers. The company's l ...



Most Commented


Popular News