04/16/2007, 3:00pm, EDT
Monday, April 16thiPhone hitting development snags?
The Leopard delay announced last week may be a sign of software development trouble for the iPhone, according to checks with component makers by research firm iSuppli. The group found that part suppliers are still slated to deliver the ingredients for the Apple device on time, suggesting that all the problems with the device rest with its software alone. Apple reportedly pushed the iPhone's release ahead slightly from the rumored June 11 launch to late June to overcome the difficulty."We're hearing it's mostly an issue with the complexity of the device," said iSuppli analyst Jagdish Rebello.
The expert also suggested that the shift of software team members from Mac OS X Leopard to the iPhone was in response to issues discovered late into the testing phase. "Typically the manufacturer and the service provider are making sure the phone meets all its specifications," he said. "It's clear they have found some issues that they need to fix."
Apple's statement last week didn't mention when the transfer had occurred, however. Financial researchers have also weighed in and posited the idea that the Leopard delay is more due to ambitious features than a shift of resources to a more urgent project. Envisioneering Group head Richard Doherty noted that the stakes were high and that Apple had to ship a truly polished device to avoid a backlash.
"They don't want it to be a version 1.0 of the iPhone, but version 4.9," he said, referring to the glitches that frequently surface in early hardware and software. "Apple wants to get it right the first time." Doherty added that he'd seen no obvious problems in the short amount of time he'd been given to try the handset.
Apple has so far supported these reports and claimed that the iPhone has already passed multiple key tests before it can be used on AT&T's cellular network this summer.
, 
, 10
, 
, 
, 
, 
Top
subscribe to comments
for this article
BTW, cblakmo, adding "more refined features" to a software (or even a hardware) project late in the game is basically asking for trouble.
I'm sure product evolution is a concern. Thought the iPod is successful, I'm sure Jobs isn't happy thinking about the 1G brick.
Just because they needed more resources doesnt indicate issues or problems. Maybe they underestimated the amount of people they need. And why wait until the last second to announce the delay? 2 words.. Wall Street. Why would you annnounce delays when you dont have to, or more to the point where they may not be one. As a huge company, you dont go announcing all of your internal business unless you have to. So maybe they werent certain that OS X would be delayed until recently.
And who says they are telling the truth anyways? maybe other "speculation" is correct where Apple wanted to add more features into OSX. Or they were having issues with OSX rather than iPhone?
Bottom line is that this is not even educated speculation. Only Apple knows and I doubt they will be sharing the info any time soon.