05/10/2007, 9:45am, EDT
Thursday, May 10thApple patent leads to smaller iPhone
Apple has developed a patent that may point the way towards smaller iPhones and touch-sensitive iPods, according to a filing published today. Titled "Back-Side Interface for Hand-Held Devices," the patent hopes to resolve the problem of including touch-sensitive input on smaller screens where the user's hand would obscure the content. The solution described would include a touch-sensitive surface on the opposite side of the screen: users would direct a cursor on the main screen by gliding a finger along the back surface corresponding to the control, triggering actions by applying extra pressure.
The technology would not only save space but would solve some of the other problems inherent to touchscreens, according to Apple. The use of touch controls on the reverse face would eliminate smudging without resorting to the use of a stylus. Owners of a theoretical future device could control many functions with one hand.
Importantly, the company's patent application has direct implications for both future iPods and iPhones. Illustrations contained within the patent show the main screen's interface allowing an on-screen overlay of the signature iPod click wheel as well as a keypad for placing phone calls or a keyboard for text entry. It could also address PDA-style functions, the firm adds in its claims.
Apple's patent was notably filed on January 5th, just a few days before the official announcement of the iPhone.

(image via Unwired View)
,
, 8
,
,
,
,
,
, 
subscribe to comments
for this article
The other advantage of this is avoiding scratches and smudges to the screen.
But then again - the original iPod [gen1] was much "bigger" and heavier than todays current offerings_
Way to go MacNN_
I knew you had it in you_
Now - let's see how long you can keep it up_
http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/06/apple-to-ace-the-ipod-click-wheel-not-likely/#comments
Finally, what's with the headline on this article? It implies 1) that Apple is working on a smaller iPhone and 2) that the primary benefit of this is smaller devices. How about "Apple patent portends less smudgy iPhones"