electronista

08/17/2007, 3:20pm, EDT

Friday, August 17th

Anti-RIAA case may go to class action

The RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) may soon bear the brunt of a class action counter-suit, according to reports. The elevation request was filed in Oregon this week on behalf of Tanya Andersen, a woman previously sued by the RIAA for illegal file sharing, but who had the accusations against her successfully dismissed with prejudice -- preventing the RIAA from seeking further action. Should the new status be granted, it will cover anyone who has been sued or threatened by the RIAA, so long as they "have not actually engaged in actual copyright infringement," the petition reads.

Andersen and her lawyer charge that the RIAA "has engaged in a coordinated enterprise to pursue a scheme of threatening and intimidating litigation in an attempt to maintain its music distribution monopoly." This most likely refers to the organization's aggressive settlement tactics, which have involved bullying defendants into a payout, or setting up an easy means of payment that discourages proceeding to court.

Also cited in the class action motion is SafeNet, formerly known as MediaSentry. The investigation agency is already facing outstanding allegations for its own tactics, said to have been done in full collusion with the RIAA. Andersen's suit suggests that SafeNet "conducts illegal, flawed and negligent investigations for the RIAA and its controlled member companies." The language used in the motion is so severe that it accuses the RIAA of breaking the RICO act, originally conceived to charge mobsters with racketeering. Even if this view were not proved to the judge, the RIAA would still have to defend itself against charges of malicious prosecution. [via Ars Technica]

, , 4comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz
4 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings

Re: not enough

0
05/15, 4:43pm, EDT

The time spent argument is part of the counter-suit being worked on, I would guess, as well as the costs due to loss of reputation and other aspects.

Of course, if the RIAA can't afford this amount, they could just find some 68 year-old grandmothers caught downloading the latest Jay-Z albums.

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline

Re: not enough

0
05/15, 4:45pm, EDT

The time spent argument is part of the counter-suit being worked on, I would guess, as well as the costs due to loss of reputation and other aspects.

Of course, if the RIAA can't afford this amount, they could just find some 68 year-old grandmothers caught downloading the latest Jay-Z albums.

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline
05/15, 6:06pm, EDT

The amount would have to be 1000 times greater to even make a small dent in the RIAA pocketbook, but even a small victory is better than no victory.

Three cheers for Tanya Anderson!!!

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Dec 2006
User is offline

hmmm....

0
05/15, 6:29pm, EDT

The RIAA does not represent the bands themselves individually, but the companies that those bands are signed with. The RIAA would give the money to the companies and then the companies would decide who gets what.

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jun 2003
User is offline
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

Convert PDF to Word: Easily Convert PDF to Word Doc, Excel, and More. Fast and Accurate. No Registration Trial

Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.