Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Virgin shutters online music store

updated 11:30 am EDT, Mon September 24, 2007

Virgin Digital Shuts Down

Virgin today announced that its online music store Virgin Digital is to shut down over the course of the next few weeks, signifying the end to the relatively short-lived attempt to compete in the direct download arena. While the company has already phased out its US service last year in a deal that saw customers transferred to Napster, UK customers will now have until September 28th to access the site without a subscription and will see a complete shutdown by October 19th. Anyone with a subscription in effect for longer than a month will receive a refund, though song credits will expire at the store if left unused, Virgin said.

The closure of the store, which opened in September 2005, is the latest in a string of mergers and shutdowns to take place in recent weeks triggered by poor sales. MTV began the trend in late August by closing the stand-alone version of its heavily promoted URGE service in favor of a deal with RealNetworks' Rhapsody store and was quickly followed by Sony, which axed its Connect store after years of unsuccessfully promoting its proprietary ATRAC format. Virgin did not comment on its reasons for discontinuing its service but is believed to have wrestled with poor sales.

Virgin Digital's demise also represents an apparent consolidation of the market that shifts the balance of the digital music market in favor of Apple's iTunes Store and away from Microsoft's Windows Media standard, which had been used by the defunct Virgin store as well as URGE. Apple has typically enjoyed dominance of online music in North America but has frequently held only a small lead over rivals in Europe.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. simdude

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2004

    0

    Subscriptions?

    Does this indicate people really don't want to rent music? Or have these services just implemented this poorly?

    Personally, I can see renting movies and tv shows, but I would never want to rent music. Is there a market for this? If so, should Apple consider offering this for those users? I would say yes if that's what enough customers want. I think Apple's goal is to drive more iPod sales and if both selling and renting does that, go for it.

  1. jarod

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2005

    0

    Good riddance

    One less Wincrap media format out there to plague the net.

  1. rtbarry

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Bwah!

    Bwaha! Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!

  1. Cadaver

    Addicted to MacNN

    Joined: Jan 2003

    0

    Does Universal know?

    So, Virgin closes their online store and cancels subscriptions, yet Universal/NBC/Vivendi is bitching that the iTunes store doesn't give them enough pricing flexibility and needs more competition.

    I think the consumers have made their intentions known - they want to OWN the content they pay for, they want a consistent pricing scheme, they want it available on their iPods and they want minimally-invasive (or better yet, none) DRM.

    Go ahead, Universal. Try to get people to buy your shows and music while forcing them to enjoy the content ONLY whilst seated at their Windows PC with Internet Explorer 6.0 in a 24 hour time period for $4.99 per unit.

    I wish you the best of luck. Pardon me while I spend my money with someone else.

  1. climacs

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Sep 2001

    0

    observations

    1) every time another online music store offering subscriptions fail, it drives another stake in the heart of that business model. Who the f*** wants to gamble that they won't own any of the music they're paying for, when the joint folds?

    2) Subscription models will never work for music because music is highly portable and repeatedly consumable. That is, you can listen to music almost anywhere but watching a film requires at the very minimum your concentration plus a screen. Your video iPod is suitable (just barely) but you can't watch that tiny screen while working out for instance but you sure can listen to tunes.

    "Repeatedly consumable" means you can listen to music over and over again - it's worth it to own it, just like it's worth it to own your house if you don't plan on moving. On the other hand, there are very few films that anyone can watch repeatedly. It takes longer to watch films and usually once is enough. Therefore it's worth it to rent or subscribe to Netflix, just like if you're going on vacation you rent a (hotel) room, or if it's a place you visit regularly but not year-round you time-share or rent. Not a perfect analogy but I think you get my drift.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Crucial MX100 256GB SATA-3 SSD

While the price-per-gigabyte ratio for magnetic platter-based hard drives can't be beat, the speed that a SSD brings to the table for ...

Narrative Clip

With the advent of social media technology, people have been searching for new ways to share the events of their daily lives -- be it ...

Blue's Mikey Digital

Blue Microphones, a company that makes some of the most popular digital USB microphones among podcasters and musicians, has for some t ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News