RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
macnn/electronista

11/27/2007, 4:40pm, EST

Tuesday, November 27th

Universal: Apple using "golden handcuffs"

Universal Music Group has been slow to acknowledge technological change and has been ensnared by the "golden handcuffs" of Apple's music efforts as a result, says the music label's chief Doug Morris in a newly published interview with Wired. The executive observes that Apple approached Universal for signing on to 2003's iTunes Music Store at a time when the latter was desperate to find a successful online music sale model and was willing to take a risk on the iTunes operator, which promised minimal damage due to its small computer marketshare and the lack of a monopoly on digital music players at the time.

But by insisting on copy protection and then allowing Apple to use a proprietary format, Universal inadvertently became dependent on iTunes for success, Morris says. The music provider cannot pull its tracks from Apple's catalog without losing a large portion of its revenue, particularly in the US.

"There's no one in the record company that's a technologist," he states. "They just didn't know what to do... We were just grateful that someone was selling online. The problem is, [Apple chief Steve Jobs] became a gatekeeper... We would hate to give up that income."

This largely confirms beliefs that many of Universal's recent moves in online music sales have been an attempt to reduce the label's dependence on Apple and re-balance online music's marketshare, giving Universal greater leverage over prices and special deals. The company in recent months has dropped its long-term contracts with Apple in favor of month-by-month services and is allegedly developing an experimental service called Total Music that will build music fees into phone subscriptions and music player purchases, providing content from multiple major labels entirely outside of the iTunes and iPod ecosystems.

Microsoft's agreement to pay a $1 royalty to Universal for every Zune sold is an early example of the business model in action, according to the interview.

Written, edited and compiled by Jeff Smith.

, , 25comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz , Twitter
25 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
Hey, Dougie
0
11/27, 4:58pm, EST
Boo Hoo Hoo. Waaa waaa waaa.... No one wants a subscription model. We want to OWN the music. "No one in the music business is a technologist"? Well, your company was owned by a Canadian Whiskey company who sold it to a French water treatment company... so maybe they don't know Music either! ;-)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jan 2003
User is offline
Translation
0
11/27, 5:00pm, EST
Before iTunes, we didn't have a clue as to how we could sell our music online and make a profit. Now that iTunes has shown us how that can be done, we want the control over exactly how much we get to rip off our customers.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Apr 2002
User is offline
Positive/Negative PR
0
11/27, 5:03pm, EST
Apple better be watching their image.

I've been reading more and more negative PR like this. I'm glad Apple offers songs for $1 across the board and TV shows for $2 but I think they need to please both hands that feed them. Right now, Apple is feeding their customers primarily (which is a great thing), but they can easily feed music labels and TV/movie studios a little more by offering a certain percentage of iPod royalty fees based on how much content is sold by a studio on iTunes.

Apple would be reaching out to these studios while pleasing customers more since studios would be inclined to offer more content.

Apple, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, don't become arrogant as you were in the 80s/90s!! Also, shed some of your greediness while you're at it. I want you to continue to succeed. Part of that continued success has to do with your image and how you treat your partners.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 2001
User is offline
re: smurfman
0
11/27, 5:19pm, EST
What are you? Communist? Share and share a like. I'll give you some of my profits if you just sit there...

Come on. Apple makes money for selling iPods and computers. They also make money for transferring music. Universal makes money by producing music and allowing others to transfer it. It's already a win/win deal. If Universal wants to create a new service, let them. iTunes is not the golden gate, it's just a path. There are lots of paths that can be taken, it just happens that iTunes was one of the first paths that lead to profits.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Mar 2003
User is offline
proprietary format
0
11/27, 5:27pm, EST
"Allow Apple to use a proprietary format"... as if they would have a choice to have used an "open" format with Microsoft that had even more restrictions?

If anything, the consumer would have been tied down more and the record companies would have more flexibility in limiting freedom of use... oh wait, that's what they wanted all along!
Mac Elite
Joined May 2001
User is offline
desperately seeking
0
11/27, 5:30pm, EST
MS is desperately seeking partners. They want to lure record labels from iTunes by offering royalty. We just have to wait and see. Zune no sells, no money.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Nov 2006
User is offline
re: Zune royalty
0
11/27, 5:32pm, EST
"Microsoft's agreement to pay a $1 royalty to Universal for every Zune sold is an early example of the business model in action, according to the interview."

Let's see, that will net Universal about $5. Smart move Universal :-)

Ken
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Nov 2007
User is offline
Translation
0
11/27, 5:44pm, EST
"...willing to take a risk on the iTunes operator, which promised minimal damage due to its small computer marketshare and the lack of a monopoly on digital music players at the time."

Translation: It wouldn't matter anyway, so we went ahead and did it. Who knew?
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Mar 2007
User is offline
I want them!
0
11/27, 5:53pm, EST
Yeah, I would love to have those Golden Handcuffs!

Where can I get 'em?

Oh... you mean, some record exec is complaining that Steve Jobs personally snapped those cuffs on the exec's wrists? Gold is too soft and malleable to be really effective cuffs...

Maybe if the exec said something about platinum handcuffs, he would be onto something...

Meh. Apple still has the right idea on prices and distribution. It is just those movie and record execs that are whining worse than a roomful of children.

User Name
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Nov 2007
User is offline
dickwads
0
11/27, 6:10pm, EST
Lets see - in 2003 - the record companies had no idea about technology. Maybe they should have asked a 12 year old.

I am so sick of these dumbasses whining. Screw you, Universal. And your mothers too.

Doofuses.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Nov 2005
User is offline
additional comments:..1..2..3..Next
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

www.cashforiphones.com - Sell your iPhone or iPod today! Get an instant online quote. Top cash, FREE shipping.

Internet Marketing School - 100% Online: Master SEO, SEM, E Commerce, Media & More with a U of San Francisco Certificate.

Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.