Text Size

Doubts cast on Mac/Windows vulnerability

updated 04:20 pm EST, Thu December 20, 2007

Mac security vs. Windows

Sharp criticism is being directed at ZDNet's George Ou for a piece suggesting that Macs are more vulnerable than Windows PCs. Ou compiled a list of Secunia notices from 2007, and noted that while Windows XP and Vista had a total of 44 security warnings issued, Mac OS X had 243, all but two of which were deemed "highly critical." One problem with this, say observers, is that Secunia itself includes a warning on its website, advising people not to use its statistics to compare products against each other.

Another claimed issue is that even flaws which are listed as critical are not necessarily more likely to occur. Mac OS X, for example, was at one point cited as having a tcpdump vulnerability, but many users may have never had to approach the application. Conversely, a DirectX opening in Windows Vista could have been exposed with a WAV or AVI file, something much more likely for the average user.

Moreover, categories for the operating systems analyzed are said to have been biased. Only XP Pro and Vista were counted on the Windows side, whereas all versions of Mac OS X were factored in, including server editions. There are also said to be a number of warnings mislabeled by Ou, ones which either affected all operating systems, third-party software, or Apple programs running on Windows or the iPhone. It is suggested that if all factors were properly weighed, a user of Mac OS X Tiger or Leopard would likely encounter far fewer risks than someone using Windows XP, and possibly Vista. [via ZDNet]

 
Previous Comments

The only real thing

12/20, 04:44pm reply

that George Ou's article casts doubt about is his credibility (and that of his employer). Nothing he says in the future will be worth listening to in my opinion. It was PURE bias.

smitch

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Nov 2005

0

Who cares...

12/20, 05:21pm reply

Simply do yourself a favor and never read any of the drivel from ZDNet or George Ou. A little thing called "the facts" seem to not be very important to either one of them anyway...

MacnTX

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Apr 2004

0

Fits a pattern

12/20, 05:23pm reply

Unfortunately, this author (George Ou) at ZDNET has a history of writing idiotic and inflammatory pieces about Apple. His writing has a history of being simultaneously confrontational and obtuse, and has attracted the scorn of many other bloggers, such as the Macalope or Daring Fireball. Why he continues to be employed - except as an unwitting, professional troll - is completely beyond me.

sixmemos

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Sep 2006

0

DIG DEEPER

12/20, 07:48pm reply

While he is digging deeper for "problems", he is also digging himself a grave.

Desperate times calls for desperate measures. Whatever it takes for notoriety and a few more clicks.

Paul Huang

Forum Regular

Joined: Sep 1999

0

Umm

12/20, 07:57pm reply

People actually still visit that trash?

jarod

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Apr 2005

0

Ou?

12/20, 08:53pm reply

Latin for fucktard.

macuserssmelllikebum

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Dec 2006

0

Ou-ch!

12/20, 09:23pm reply

If you actually believe the inane ravings of Ou's rant, go back to your Vista desktop and get back to work!

brainiac_7

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jun 2005

0

What surprises me...

12/20, 09:36pm reply

is that Ou still has a platform to write on...

ebernet

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Oct 2003

0

can't tell s*** from...

12/20, 11:16pm reply

George Ou looses tons of credibility here. Anyone claiming Vista or any other flavor of Windows is more secure than OSX are just too dumb for words.

Clearly this guy gets perks from MS-hence the bias. The thing I can't figure out is why we in the Mac community haven't gotten used to it yet. As Mac climbs towards double digits in terms of market share, MS's position becomes threatened. The truth won't work here, so they have to lie their Ballmers off.

Monde

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jan 2004

0

Daniel sums it up nicely

12/21, 02:27am reply

Daniel Dilger wrote a good article summing up "Mac are More Vulnerable" article.

http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/12/20/vista-vs-mac-os-x-security-why-george-ous-zdnet-vulnerability-numerology-is-absurd/

TheCrow

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Feb 2006

0

Popular News