Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Air's "thinnest" claim thwarted by 1997 PC?

updated 11:55 am EST, Wed January 16, 2008

MB Air vs Mitsu Pedion

Apple's claim to have the world's thinnest notebook in the form of the MacBook Air may not account for a 10-year-old notebook, says a claim from CNET. Although as thin at every point, the 1998-era Mitsubishi Pedion maintained a uniform thickness of 0.72 inches when closed, just slighly thinner than the new MacBook's 0.76-inch figure at its thickest point. This came despite a smaller 12-inch screen and considerably older technology, which included a 233MHz Pentium MMX. The HP co-developed notebook used magnesium instead of aluminum but also required a unique design to reach its dimensions.

Other historical notebooks have also come close, such as a version of the Sony VAIO X505 made partly out of carbon fiber, according to challengers of Apple's claim. However, most past systems have also historically expensive, with the Mitsubishi PC costing $6,000 and most such systems costing $2,000 or more despite slower performance than larger models. The Pedion was withdrawn quickly from the market after technical problems marred its debut.

Apple itself has shied away from making an all-time claim for the MacBook Air's thickness, which gives the Mac builder the ability to focus its comparisons strictly on current-day ultraportable notebooks such as the VAIO TZ without drawing absolute comparisons.

Mitsubishi Pedion



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. Eriamjh

    Addicted to MacNN

    Joined: Oct 2001

    0

    Not thinnest EVER

    just thinnest for sale today.

  1. bfalchuk

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2003

    0

    despite?

    Why despite a smaller screen? Shouldn't it be "because of" its smaller screen?

  1. rtbarry

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +1

    another...

    ...seriously flawed and trollishly misleading headline from MacNN.

    keep up the awesome journalism, fellas!

  1. eldarkus

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2004

    -1

    wow

    Guess cnet has way too much time on their hands!!!

  1. eldarkus

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2004

    -1

    @rtbarry

    You cant call this journalism... journalists actually write articles, do research, etc. MacNN staff just copy text from other articles.

  1. danviento

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2005

    0

    Since it's an wedge

    you should average the extereme change in width. I wonder how the '97 machine sold...

  1. JackWebb

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2007

    0

    New Claim

    As soon as it gets into customers hands how about, "The world's thinnest ever actual working notebook."

  1. jayparry

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2005

    0

    average

    i think even tho at its thickest point its slightly thicker i think you should AVERAGE the thickness throughout the macbook air (.16 = .76)/2 = .54 and thats overall thinner than the other

  1. Jonathan-Tanya

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2004

    +1

    do NOT average

    You should measure by maximum thickness not average.

    Think about it. If it was average, then you can just extend the machine with a paper thin section for as long as needed, to bring your average down.

    Average is meaningless. If you need to fit it into a .5" slot, it won't fit, unless the maximum thickness is less than .5"

    Honestly, portability isn't about hard numbers...its about a lot of factors, many of which the Apple Macbook Air lacks, which is why this apple fan, predicts it will be a failure.

    Eee PC type portability, or built in broad band....stuff like that would make an ultraportable....not something that is thin. Thin wasn't what people really wanted.

  1. Geobunny

    Mac Elite

    Joined: Oct 2000

    0

    decimals?

    Slightly OT but when did you people start quoting Inches in decimals? Inches are divided into 8ths or 16ths, not tenths. It may be slightly awkward but that's how everyone does it.

    Yes, I know that's how Apple write it on their website; they're wrong too!

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Samsung Galaxy S 5

The Samsung Galaxy S5 might be the phone that Android users have been craving for some time. Information coming out of Mobile World Co ...

STM Trust technology bag

The search for a good messenger bag that doubles as a laptop bag is something many travelers find themselves facing at least once. Bet ...

PenClic Bluetooth mouse

Windows 8 aside, computer users have been trained that a mouse is the proper way to navigate through the desktop for many years now. T ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News