Printed from

AMD releases budget Radeon HD 3000 cards

updated 09:00 am EST, Wed January 23, 2008

AMD Radeon HD 3400 3600

AMD this morning released what it says are some of the first entry-level desktop video cards to provide video features previously reserved for high-end models. Both the starter Radeon HD 3400 under the company's ATI label and more mid-range Radeon HD 3600 series share the same basic architecture as the high-end Radeon HD 3800 but reduce the clock speed and number of stream (graphics shader) processors to bring the price to a reasonable level; where the 3800 goes with a full 320 stream units, the 3400 series goes with 40 and the 3600 uses 120, AMD says. In spite of this, all the new cards support enhanced lighting and other visual effects in DirectX 10.1 and newer versions of OpenGL 2; they are also some of the first to support as many as two DisplayPort connectors for newer, advanced displays such as the Dell 3008WFP.

Either card lineup is also capable of fully decoding 1080p video in hardware and can pipe up to 5.1-channel audio through any video card with an HDMI connection, making them ideal for home theater setups. Every card is single-slot and fits into slimmer PCs; however, the base Radeon HD 3450 is also capable of running entirely on passive cooling and is virtually silent even in tight enclosures.

This as well as the higher-clocked Radeon HD 3470 and more complex Radeon HD 3650 all attach through PCI Express 1.0 or 2.0 slots and are already slated to ship inside computers from major computer makers, though these have not been named outside of Dell; Apple currently uses their immediate precedents, the Radeon HD 2400 and 2600, in its iMac desktops. Stand-alone cards for PCs are expected to sell between just $49 and $65 for the Radeon HD 3400 line and $79 to $99 for the Radeon HD 3600 range.

Radeon HD 3470

Radeon HD 3650

By Electronista Staff


  1. David Esrati

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 1999


    Work in a MacPro?

    Yes, but will it work in a MacPro? Apple has been letting down the buyers of their premium systems by not providing the drivers for common cards. My 6 month old Mac Pro can't take the newest release- and the other cards it will accept are 2.5 yr old designs and not available at a reasonable price. Apple needs to support it's pro users.

  1. syzygi

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2008


    David, in a word, No.

    It will not work in a MacPro. It's too bad AMD bought ATI. If Intel had bought ATI I think things would be much better. Apple has a great relationship with Intel, that as created incredible products together. The next step is to create the same kind of innovative relationship with a graphics card manufacture. Intels integrated graphics blows unless you only need a very basic system.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...

Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 (Android, 10.1-inch)

Lenovo is building a bigger name for itself year after year, including its devices expanding beyond desktop computers. The company's l ...

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, the process is not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often t ...



Most Commented


Popular News