Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Warner sues SeeqPod, tests digital copyright

updated 03:00 pm EST, Fri January 25, 2008

Warner Sues SeeqPod

Warner Music Group has revealed that it is suing search engine firm SeeqPod for copyright infringement. The music label accuses SeeqPod of illegally offering music from Warner through its unique search method, which looks for MP3s and other music files and placing them into a Flash interface that allows users to stream (but not download) the songs. By allowing users to access tracks without blocking copyrighted material, SeeqPod is guilty of both immediate infringement by playing the content and secondary infringement by guiding users to where they can obtain bootlegs, Warner claims. The lawsuit would collect as much as $150,000 in damages per song.

SeeqPod has denied the accusations made in the complaint and says it will use the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's "safe harbor" clause as a core element of defense. As SeeqPod is neither hosting nor explicitly aware of which songs are infringing on Warner's copyrights, it cannot be held directly responsible for any copyright violations that may take place, according to the company. Instead, any infringement has to first be reported to SeeqPod to give the firm an opportunity to remove any offending material.

The approach mirrors similar positions held by Internet service providers, many of whom have resisted liability claims or demands that they filter content under safe harbor rules. It may also provide a crucial foundation for both online services as well as device and software makers, many of whom include code that can potentially allow illegal material to be transferred or played without restrictions.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. dagamer34

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2007

    0

    O_o

    I'd argue that Google can do the same thing plus let you download the files. It's not that hard. Just search for a song with filetype:mp3 in the query and you've hit the jackpot.

    Suing because someone made it easier is a bit... stupid!

  1. VHMP01

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2007

    0

    No suing Warner...

    What about a new plan scheme that charges 1 Cent every time you listen to a song and 10 Cents for a movie, forever; no matter what device, or means, or via, or whatever way you choose at the moment, just log in and be charged for the ones you select, and change password anytime. No monthly fees, the more you love a single to listen to or movie you watch, the more you pay; perhaps up to $5 or $10 per song, and $1 or $2 per movie in your lifetime (You’ll hear a great song much more times than you’ll watch a great movie). Although one problem would be to charge kids without credit or debit cards, could always charge their parents. You also would have to transfer subscriptions to other means of charge if you intend to cancel any credit card. Anyway, it would only have to be as simple to use as possible.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 2030 projector

With high-definition televisions now the standard, 4K televisions becoming the next big thing, and plasma TVs going the way of the din ...

Life n Soul 8 Driver Bluetooth headphones

When it comes to music on the go, consumers generally have some options to consider when looking for the best experience. While Blueto ...

Tesoro Tizona G2N Elite gaming keyboard

The market for gaming keyboards is getting crowded, starting off with some fairly simple keyboards and diverging into the land of modu ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News