03/10/2008, 8:35am, EDT
Monday, March 10thMS: no immediate plans to merge Yahoo tech
Microsoft would not immediately begin merging technology if its proposed takeover of Yahoo goes through, the company's chief software architect Ray Ozzie has explained in an interview. Although the two companies often have competing technologies, Microsoft would move slowly to integrate either firm's technology with the other. The work climates and technical foundations are said to be too different to encourage an early start and could alienate users if forced together too quickly.
"Technology companies, if they dive in and just smash things together for smashing them together’s sake, it’s reckless," Ozzie says.
The Windows developer is primarily interested in Yahoo for its web ad platform, which would serve as a rival to Google's dominant system. However, both also run search engines, photo sharing services, news portals, and other services that frequently overlap with one another, creating conflicts of interest. Yahoo has been resisting the deal in an attempt to maintain independence and recently called Microsoft's unsolicited move a distraction from revitalizing its core business.
Filed under: industry
Other story tags: Microsoft, Google, Yahoo
,
, 10
,
,
,
,
, 
subscribe to comments
for this article
Were I Yahoo, I'd be pissed that M$ keeps pressuring them which has some of its shareholders ready to sue to make the purchase happen, though any of those suits aren't likely to go through.
If M$ wants to keeping shooting itself in the foot, it won't be long before they don't have any feet for their rep to stand on.
You can't trust this company one bit (literally). Still, I say let them spend their money and lose it all. I feel bad for anybody who works at Yahoo, but to me this looks like one big long rope for MS to hang itself with.
If Apple comes out with a "Fuze-Lighter" before this thing hits the market, SanDisk's R&D money will yet again go up in smoke. I predict, no market boom for the Fuze, just a fizzle.
C'mon Apple, where's the next leap ahead?
No other posting site has this issue. Wierd, isn't it?
We have the thank MacNN's implementation of vBulletin, and their bad coders, for that.
One small thing : iPhones currently need iTunes for management. A lot of enterprise organisations do not allow the installation of Quicktime or iTunes on internal client PCs. It would not be rocket science to solve this by stripping down iTunes to an iPhone desktop client.
If IT is serious about making the iPhone happen, they will adjust filters to be more specific when relating to these two apps. The reason usually cited for filtering is to stop people from streaming music (oddly enough, I can stream music ONLY through iTunes- they haven't caught on yet).
Does anyone know what ports software updates and such use? If it is port specific, it'd be a simple change, or if your filters allow for specific sites to become exceptions to filter rules, then your necessary utilities would get through.
Personally, I see the point as mute. These hold-over measures might help, but when enough people clamor for adoption, especially those with hire/fire power, IT will have to relent.
I sincerely dount Apple will make a "business" iphone, their track record shows that "pro" models are simply more powerful and retain features that still use the same OS/software. The best you can hope for is an external keyboard connect via the dock connector. Look to a 3rd party for that little piece of hardware.