FCC ups 'broadband' bar, bans apartment phone deals
updated 04:35 pm EDT, Wed March 19, 2008
FCC ups 'broadband' bar
The Federal Communications Commission has voted to change how broadband access in the US is measured, say reports. The old system was been criticized by various parties as distorted, using outdated and overly generous criteria; "high speed" was considered to be 200Kbps or faster, and access was sometimes considered to be widespread in ZIP codes where only one connection was present. Because this produced bad data, the FCC argues that it hindered any serious federal broadband policies, as well as how much investment would be made into infrastructure, whether public or private.
"When companies and investors put money into e-commerce or voice-over Internet protocol or Internet video," says Commissioner Michael Copps, "they need to know what kind of broadband infrastructure America actually has."
Many specifics of the FCC's changes have yet to be published, but some details are already known. "Basic broadband" now consists of download speeds between 768Kbps and 1.5Mbps, instead of 200Kbps; both upload and download speeds must be reported, and instead of two levels of access ratings, there are now five. ISPs must reveal the number of subscribers in each census tract, and may eventually be required to show how much they charge.
In another matter, Reuters notes that the FCC has voted to ban exclusive deals between phone companies and apartment complex owners, voiding any already in place. These deals are said to hurt market competition, at least in part because they stop people from choosing rival "triple-play" packages that combine voice, TV and Internet service. This echoes a similar undoing of exclusive deals between apartments and cable companies.











Sweet
03/19, 05:43pm reply
ABOUT FREAKING TIME. 200kbps isn't even broadband. It's like super dial-up. Regardless, it's still dial-up!!
dagamer34
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Apr 2007
FCC Not Allowing Deals
03/19, 06:36pm reply
I could understand not limiting user choice, but how is not having a 'group' package not beneficial to some customers. Those wanting other deals should not be hindered i would agree.
MiMiC
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jun 2007
ugh..
03/19, 07:04pm reply
It looked really nice until I saw the pixelated text. Looks like my Apple IIc. :P
eldarkus
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Feb 2004
mimic
03/19, 09:37pm reply
You've misunderstood.
The FCC is banning exclusivity deals between phone service providers and apartment complexes. The FCC is not banning group packages.
Reread the article.
msuper69
Mac Elite
Joined: Jan 2000
US behind
03/19, 10:42pm reply
Maybe that will give US companies some incentives to catch up with the rest of the industrialized world, where "Basic" is 10 Mpbs and high speed is 28Mbps or more. The US is like a third world country...
No wonder the dollar keeps sinking and the country is in so much trouble.
marmotton
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jul 2004
Faster Speeds on the Way?
03/19, 11:09pm reply
Maybe this will give Verizon the kick that they need to get them to realize that they boost the speeads of their services. I'm surfing on a 768 Kbps DSL line, and to my knowledge, this has been our package since 2001. Aren't service levels supposed to reach higher bars over time, without price hikes?
michaelper22
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Sep 2007