04/24/2008, 9:25am, EDT
Thursday, April 24thMicrosoft: no demand to keep XP past June
Microsoft would be willing to keep Windows XP available for everyday computers past its June 30th cutoff date but doesn't see a demand for it, company CEO Steve Ballmer said at a Belgian media conference today. The executive acknowledges that enough feedback would have his company extend XP's on-sale period, but argues that "most consumers" are choosing to buy PCs with the newer Windows Vista operating system installed and that few retailers stock computers preloaded with its 2001 ancestor.
Those most likely to demand XP are businesses, as many are more cautious to upgrade and need to ensure that new systems can interoperate well with "old machines," according to Ballmer.
The claims come despite Microsoft's late decision to extend XP sales past mid-year for increasingly popular low-cost systems such as the ASUS Eee PC, which lack the performance to run Vista smoothly. Petitions have also circulated online calling for a more general extension, while Dell has allegedly said it will continue selling XP as an option until 2012 despite Microsoft virtually all support by 2010.
Filed under: industry
Other story tags: Microsoft, ASUS, Vista, Eee PC
,
, 38
,
,
,
,
,
, 
subscribe to comments
for this article
It's a fact that people are generally shunning Vista, except the mindless herd. Well, maybe Ballmer is right after all.
So, if I need to buy an XP license, I rather know that I have to plan on doing this before June.
So it's useful enough.
They must be kidding. This is about as far from the reality of WIN user demand as you could get. Vista is selling because it's bundled. There's plenty of evidence that it's being tossed aside for XP "downgrades". What's the harm in selling only the pro version - and making it the standard for FreshStart (which passed over XP entirely and is now shipping 2000Pro to run on donated computers...)
It's not like seeing the word "Windows" causes one's eyes to burn, one hopes.
By the way, How the f--- does such harsh language have to be used to on a website dealing with the Mac? And why the hell am I made uncomfortable reading comments due to profanity setting off work's content filter on a Mac- Centered Website?
If reading this post truly angered you that strongly, I suggest some anger management classes. That strong a reaction just can't be heart-healthy.
Oh, yeah....wait a minute, one's "done" and the other will be......never mind.