RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
macnn/electronista

05/30/2008, 10:55am, EDT

Friday, May 30th

MS Echoes would "get rid" of phone numbers

Microsoft has devised a strategy that would largely eliminate the need to use phone numbers for calling on cellphones, ZDNet says. Echoes would link a user's Windows Live Messenger contacts to a phone number through a cellular provider and would let cellphone users choose one of their IM contacts as the recipient; as information would be automatically linked between the two, users could place calls without ever knowing someone else's phone number, Microsoft claims. The information would be sent automatically to a phone's contact list without needing a dedicated instant messaging client.


Importantly, the technology would also intelligently bridge standards when trying to reach someone who is only available through a PC. A standard voice call would register as a voice chat in the Live Messenger client, while text messages would appear as SMS on the phone and as standard chats for the computer. For computer users, an active cellphone would always appear online and thus let them send both audio and text on their own.

The effort will begin with a phase known as Wave 1 that will launch in the summer with unspecific phone companies and a beta Live Messenger client. Successive waves will add unified entertainment and security services; it may also include a set of extra services that will spring from Microsoft's acquisition of Danger earlier this year.

To date, competitors such as AOL and Yahoo have yet to offer this kind of unified access, with integration normally limited to sending SMS messages from PCs to phones.


Filed under: industry, software
Other story tags: Microsoft, Yahoo, AOL, Echoes

, , 16comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz , Twitter
16 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All
   Global Settings

How is this......

2
05/30, 11:13am, EDT

....much different than the "speed dial" I've had on my land line phone since the 1970s? Isn't this just a natural extension of that concept/process?

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 2003
User is offline

Again, why

-1
05/30, 11:20am, EDT

Why do we keep having to go to MACNN for Microsoft news? Is there not enough Mac news?

So...

4
05/30, 11:20am, EDT

Instead of your number being 843-555-2859 it'll be 'iLuv2eatCheez98'... yeah, that's easier?

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 2008
User is offline

Do democrats know??

-5
05/30, 11:23am, EDT

The wireless warrant tapping is all the rage on Capital Hill as the dems put "pressure" on the giant telecoms and blame the current administration that it is violating the US Constitution and yet MS is coming up with a method where "Windows Live Messenger contacts to a phone number through a cellular provider and would let cellphone users choose one of their IM contacts as the recipient; as information would be automatically linked between the two, users could place calls without ever knowing someone else's phone number..." So now I don't need your phone number to call you. Maybe there was a reason I don't have your phone number... Sound a little like personal evasion of privacy. Someone tell the dems, quick...

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Feb 2008
User is offline

how do you evade privacy?

1
05/30, 11:51am, EDT

Evading privacy, is that like walking around nude, carrying a sign with your credit card numbers, soc. security number, etc?

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jul 2006
User is offline

uhuh

3
05/30, 12:06pm, EDT

MS trying to push their own lousy standard over another existing, well-established one? Yeah sure, why not.

Plus, who in the WORLD remembers phone numbers??? You hack em into your phone, save them under Contacts, and forget them instantly for ever after.

Another brain fart from the Ballmer Boys.

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline

And the number is...

2
05/30, 12:15pm, EDT

Yes everyone will now only have to dial 666 and then take the phone to Mount Doom to complete the call.

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Sep 2005
User is offline

Re: of course

-4
05/30, 1:35pm, EDT

it came from MS, so it must be bad. "Let's blast it, boys!" If it were Apple talking about this with .Mac accounts, you'd be struggling to keep yourselves from wetting your pants in glee at their innovations...

But, to those who can't seem to figure it out

1) This is different then speed-dialing by the dialer not needing to even have your phone number.

2) It would obviously be something you would sign-up for, and thus not some type of 'evasion' of privacy.

3) The point is not having to have a phone number that needs to be hacked into your device, which, if it changes, is no longer valid.

And, Jeronimo2000, what well-established system currently in place handles what is mentioned in the article?

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline

F**k microsoft

2
05/30, 1:41pm, EDT

Yet another way Microsoft is attempting to force people into using their products.

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 1999
User is offline

And To Think...

0
05/30, 5:31pm, EDT

Most people I know only got headaches from smoking seeds...

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Apr 2000
User is offline
additional comments:..1..2..Next
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

www.cashforiphones.com - Sell your iPhone or iPod today! Get an instant online quote. Top cash, FREE shipping.

Internet Marketing School - 100% Online: Master SEO, SEM, E Commerce, Media & More with a U of San Francisco Certificate.

Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.