macnn/electronista

08/13/2008, 12:15pm, EDT

Wednesday, August 13th

Intel publishes USB 3.0 controller spec

Intel on Wednesday hoped to settle a conflict in standards on Wednesday by publishing a draft version of the controller interface spec for USB 3.0, the next generation of its peripheral format. The information provides a guide for hardware makers to relay information from the USB controller hardware to the software that manages it and helps settle a dispute triggered by AMD and NVIDIA, which accused Intel of knowingly withholding information about the interface to give systems based on Intel hardware an advantage over those using rival copmonents.

The specification is under license but doesn't include a royalty, allowing AMD and other companies wanting to promote USB 3.0 to use the technology without having to pay Intel a recurring fee for support. AMD mentions in the announcement that it supports the publication as part of an open standard.

Publishing the information lets computer part builders start sooner on integrating USB 3.0 into finished hardware, which is most likely to appear sometime in 2009. The connection standard is also known as SuperSpeed USB and is planned to deliver over ten times more bandwidth than USB 2.0, peaking at up to 5Gbps and potentially eclipsing the rival FireWire 3200 spec in practical output.


Filed under: computers, industry, peripherals
Other story tags: Intel, NVIDIA, AMD

, , 2comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz
2 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings

More than just speed

2
08/13, 12:59pm, EDT

It's more than just speed. The major weakness of USB is that if you've got too many devices attached, it'll suck up all your CPU cycles.

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Apr 2007
User is offline

RE: More

-1
08/13, 3:33pm, EDT

There are USB cards that do their own math to free-up the CPUs.

The biggest plus is that USB has been using the same interfaces since their launch, and unfortunately that is not true with FW.

At this point if FW-III wants to be a serious contender to USB-III it needs to go back to the widely used FW-I interface.

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2007
User is offline
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.