Exclusive Deal While supplies last, save 40% off over 40 iPhone 5 and iPhone 4/4S cases and chargers as well as Samsung S III cases at Kensington.com. Use coupon code 'SAVE40%' at checkout to receive this exclusive discount.      

'Huge' exploit threatens most Internet data

updated 11:55 am EDT, Wed August 27, 2008

 

Internet BGP Exploit


A new security hole in the Internet Protocol is potentially the most severe ever discovered, according to a presentation by security experts Anton Kapela and Alex Pilosov. The two have revealed that the inherent nature of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), which is essential for optimizing and routing traffic on the Internet, allows a hacker to redirect traffic to his own servers and forward it along without interrupting connections or otherwise immediately exposing the attack. The method would allow a malicious user to either spy on unprotected traffic or alternately 'poison' the data with altered code before it reaches its destination.

The method can't easily be fought since the BGP protocol itself requires an explicit level of trust to work as written, the experts say. The currently proposed solution would rely on BBN Technologies chief security scientist Stephen Kent's recently developed Secure BGP standard, which would force each router online to sign its routing map data and let network providers determine whether or not they will accept changes made by that router. A provider could establish blacklists that cut off unknown or actively hostile routers.

When a fix could be implemented is unknown and may not be likely in the near future, as a similar approach was demonstrated as early as 1998 but hasn't been introduced due to the performance issues associated with signing traffic in real time. The absence of a full attack using existing BGP flaws has also reduced the pressure to implement any short-term fixes.

News of the possible attack follows after revelations of a Domain Name Server (DNS) exploit earlier in the year that could falsely point users intending to visit one website to a different address, opening them to web-based attacks. Most operating system and browser developers affected by the DNS hole have patched against it.


By Electronista Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :  

industry, security, networking
toggle

Previous Comments

  1. nat

    Junior Member

    Joined: Mar 2002

    -1

    what

    what is the device in the picture?


  1. Kainzow

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2007

    +1

    It is

    a Belkin N1 Vision wireless router:http://www.belkin.com/n1vision/intro/


  1. lkrupp

    Junior Member

    Joined: May 2001

    -3

    Uh Oh!

    Somehow, someway , this is all Apple's fault. That's how the Mac universe operates. Blaming Apple is like Einstein's theory of general relativity; it's a basic law of the physical world.


  1. Smurfman

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2001

    0

    IPv6 a solution??

    Would IPv6 be a solution to this problem?? Requiring router certificates seems an extreme amount of work!

    If the internet standardizes on IPv6, there may not even be a need for routers or firewalls! Anyone who knows more on this subject, please enter your 2˘ worth.


  1. icewing

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2008

    +2

    Huh?!?

    Who's blaming Apple? I didn't even see Apple mentioned in the article. ???


  1. amutti

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2005

    +2

    IPv6

    IPv6 should not allow 'spying' or 'poisoning' of data due to the required IPsec.


  1. macomaciak

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2008

    0

    IPv6

    a lot of ipv6 features have been backported to ipv4, so we have them already. anyway, to trust routing or to trust DNS seems just ridiculous to me. that is what the SSL (and other) mechanisms are for: to encrypt the traffic between two hosts and to establish the identity of the server (and in some cases that of the client too) in a first place - presenting the valid certificate.

    so as long as for secure communication (like with your bank) a secure protocol is used (which is) you are not affected by any of these vulnerabilities.
    if you still use telnet in 2008.. good luck!




Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

Sponsor

 
toggle

Popular News