Chrome browser gains new EULA, security warning

updated 12:10 pm EDT, Thu September 4, 2008

 

Chrome EULA, security


Google's newly-launched Chrome browser -- currently Windows-only but expected to launch soon for Mac and Linux -- is already taking some serious criticism, according to various groups. An initial concern was Google's end-user license agreement (EULA), which effectively claimed the right to use anything posted online via the browser, raising issues of both privacy and intellectual property. This language was actually a mistake, Google now claims.

"In order to keep things simple for our users, we try to use the same set of legal terms (our Universal Terms of Service) for many of our products," admits Rebecca Ward, Google's senior product counsel for Chrome. The company has already changed Section 11 of Chrome's Terms of Service, amending it to read that "You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services."

Chrome is also said to have some security vulnerabilities however, including a URL handler issue that can crash a browser after visiting a malicious link. One researcher, Aviv Raff, also notes that Chrome appears to be using an outdated version of Apple's WebKit technology, leaving it exposed to a carpet-bombing attack. In combination with a Java bug, Chrome users could potentially be lured into downloading and running a malware executable with no means of intervening. The latest version of Safari is safeguarded against this threat.

Owners of Windows Vista may be vulnerable to a separate problem, due to files being downloaded to the desktop by default. Without fixing this setting, Vista could be attacked with the help of a security flaw in Internet Explorer.


By Electronista Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :  

security, software, Google, Vista, Windows, Safari, browsers, WebKit, Chrome
toggle

Previous Comments

  1. boulder1259

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2002

    +1

    It was a mistake...

    but also believe it was intentional.


  1. Duo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Mar 2001

    +1

    Yep

    I think they tried to pull a fast one on us. Most people don't read the EULA. Thanks goes out to those who read the EULA.


  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +2

    Re: Yep

    Or it just shows that even the lawyers don't read the EULA


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Logitech FabricSkin Keyboard Folio for iPad

Since the fourth-generation iPad didn't evolve much over its predecessor, the market for iPad accessories has remained somewhat static ...

Huawei Ascend Mate

The Huawei Ascend Mate is a phone that fits the screen-size gap between the 4 to 5-inch smartphone and the seven-inch or more tablet, ...

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Sponsor

 
toggle

Popular News