Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Joost moving video from desktop to web?

updated 01:30 pm EDT, Fri September 5, 2008

Joost quits desktop client

Joost will soon announce it will stop making its desktop client and focus instead on a browser-based player for delivering web videos, according to a Friday report from GigaOM. The move will not quite step down to the level of YouTube or Hulu, which are strictly web pages, as it will require a browser plug-in that promises to deliver better video quality through peer-to-peer technology than the competition's traditional approach. The current interface (pictured) was designed to provide a more TV-like experience to users, who so far haven't embraced the idea.

The believed reasons for users shying away from the Joost interface are many, including the bandwidth limitations they impose, software complications and the relative lack of content. Earlier this year, Warner announced it would provide web-based video sites including Joost, Veoh and others with dedicated channels, promising a September launch; while this may still happen, the nature of Joost's current interface is said to potentially complicate the issue. Joost competitors Veoh and Jaman have recently likewise changed to a browser-and-client strategy, moving away from the client.

A web-only Joost would also help the company's finances by allowing for more ads and other promotional content to appear during playback versus the TV-like commercials that limit the company's ability to generate income.



By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

  1. starwarrior

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2006

    0

    Time consuming

    To complicated. They want too much information.

    Always upgrading. Waste of time

  1. Guest

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 1999

    0

    stupid

    Since they appear to have developed the application for viewing their videos, they certainly could leave room for banner ads. But people really don't like seeing banner ads while they are watching a show. The rest of the reasons [bandwidth limitations, but still using same method as before, so no difference], [software complications, just switching from an app to a custom plugin], [lack of content, changing to web doesn't affect this], this change is unlikely to make a difference for their business.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Sound Blaster Roar Bluetooth speaker

There could very well be a new king of the hill for Bluetooth speakers, with Sound Blaster's recent entry into the marketplace. Bringi ...

Kenu Airframe Plus

Simple, stylish and effective, the Kenu Airframe + portable car mount is the latest addition to Kenu's lineup. Released earlier this y ...

Plantronics Rig Surround 7.1 headset

Trying to capture the true soundscape of video games can be a daunting task. Looking to surround-sound home theater options, users hav ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News