Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Big labels crafting free music video hub?

updated 02:45 pm EST, Mon December 22, 2008

Music Label Hulu Rival

The four major music labels are in the midst of negotiations that could result in a new, company-indendent service for music videos, an alleged source tipping Alley Insider says. EMI, Sony, Universal and Warner are said considering a joint venture that would put all their music videos in a central location. The effort would let them tighten their control over ads and potentially generate more revenue than YouTube as well as separate its content from amateur videos that happen to share similar music.

The companies are believed frustrated by their current deals with YouTube, which provide most of their income from view counts rather than ads. An independent site would also let the labels more tightly integrate videos with direct track purchases from online music stores as well as concert tickets.

No agreement is seen as imminent and the companies are still considering alternatives, according to the claimed insider, though the current deals with YouTube will expire by early 2009 and thus leave room for changes. Any renewed deals are nonetheless expected to lean in YouTube's favor.

A major third-party site would be considered a music equivalent to the Fox/NBC joint project Hulu and has the potential to affect the popularity of music videos online, which has been helped by YouTube but is relatively limited otherwise. Outside of YouTube, some of the largest music video revenue online comes from purchases through iTunes.



By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

  1. Guest

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 1999

    +1

    Hello...

    Collusion!

    Seriously, how can the 5 labels that have the majority of the music market sewn up, be allowed to group together to create their own company to 'sell' their videos (either through ad revenue or direct sales)? I'll bet it'll be an accident that there will be 95% administrative overhead in this company (which is forwarded to the labels as 100% profit), and the remaining 5% will be sent to the label as payment for the video's themselves, so the performers get a fraction of a fraction

  1. Eldernorm

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2007

    +1

    just a thought

    Hmmmm, a third party site to put all music videos where they can get more money than a per view count.?????

    Ever consider iTunes/???? Just a thought.
    :-)

    en

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Re: Hello

    Collusion!

    Seriously, how can the 5 labels that have the majority of the music market sewn up, be allowed to group together to create their own company to 'sell' their videos (either through ad revenue or direct sales)?


    Where does it say they can't sell their own music, that they must distribute their music to other places to sell?

  1. MeandmyMac

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2008

    0

    There's a difference?!

    "...separate its content from amateur videos that happen to share similar music."

    Amateur music videos as opposed to professional music videos... there's a difference?!

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Crucial MX100 256GB SATA-3 SSD

While the price-per-gigabyte ratio for magnetic platter-based hard drives can't be beat, the speed that a SSD brings to the table for ...

Narrative Clip

With the advent of social media technology, people have been searching for new ways to share the events of their daily lives -- be it ...

Blue's Mikey Digital

Blue Microphones, a company that makes some of the most popular digital USB microphones among podcasters and musicians, has for some t ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News