RIAA to shed more staff in "bloodbath"
updated 11:30 am EST, Mon March 2, 2009
RIAA staff cuts deepen
The recent budget cuts that have the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) cutting its staff are more pronounced than initially expected, says a Friday Hypebot report. Due to an increased number of people purchasing digital songs online, the RIAA's role of suing individuals for illegal file sharing is reduced, with the music labels that fund the organization cutting the budget significantly.
The source says more than 100 people employed at RIAA in the US and across the world will be relieved of duty, calling it a "bloodbath." Employees who specialize in anti-piracy will be let go, while the IFPI and BPI offices will be coordinated. EMI and Universal chiefs Guy Hands and Doug Morris, both major sponsors of the RIAA, are named as largely responsible for the cuts, disclosed after proposed ISP monitoring has fallen through in the US.
The DC-based offices will be closed, with one part of the floor retained just to save the company's address. The unnamed source maintains an official announcement regarding the budget cuts by RIAA is expected to be made by early next week.
What will remain to help music labels fight piracy, the source says, is an aggregate of London-based International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), the leftovers of Britain's BPI (once known as the British Phonographic Industry) and the RIAA.












Nice
03/02, 12:19pm reply
Couldn't happen to a nicer organization.
loudpedal
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
bloodbath?
03/02, 12:27pm reply
Laying off 100 employees is a "bloodbath"?
I used to work for a company that would lay off thousands in an afternoon.
hayesk
Professional Poster
Joined: Sep 1999
Sob....
03/02, 12:42pm reply
Sob....sniff...whimper.
This is so sad....NOT!!!
noibs
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jul 2007
it's too bad...
03/02, 12:52pm reply
i'm not going to celebrate people getting laid off; that's not a good thing.
however i do hope they are able to find jobs with organizations that aren't as despicable as the RIAA.
stainboy
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Sep 2005
really...
03/02, 12:56pm reply
Due to an increased number of people purchasing digital songs online, the RIAA's role of suing individuals for illegal file sharing is reduced,
There's a stretch. "More people are buying digital music, so we don't need to sue file sharers as much".
Isn't it more like "Every attempt we've made to attack file sharers has been met with hostility, venom, and pure hatred, and, oh yeah, any time someone hasn't rolled over and played dead, we've had our asses handed to us in court. Ergo, we're killing that part of the association."
testudo
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Aug 2001
arists
03/02, 12:56pm reply
I sure hope these issues don't cause the labels to 'forget' to pay the artists their 3 cents on the dollar taken in.
testudo
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Aug 2001
Incorrect
03/02, 01:52pm (1 reply) reply
Testudo - to get all Wikipedia, please cite your sources. Unless you have a particularly poor lawyer / manager you should be getting at least 12% from combined mechanicals/publishing.
Yes, I know that still sounds way low, but bear in mind that an artist on an indie will be on something closer to a 50/50 deal . . . on relatively low sales. A Madonna/U2/Jackson league artist will also have a deal weighed in their favour (historically they were known as prestige artists - they didn't make much profit but they helped with the prestige of the label, back when labels competed to sign artists).
The whole reason that someone can get you to sign away over 85% of your income is because they claim they're going to deliver millions, not thousands, of sales.
This is pretty much the same way any business works - Walmart demand you sell to them at practically cost price because they will give you volume.
And if you think that's bad, just wait until you see what replaces it, as recording becomes a promotional cost - the people who can deliver 'Top 10' success are still going to take big cuts. Consider something like the X-Factor as model for the type of business replacing the old model.
JulesLt
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jul 2005
Karma
03/02, 03:49pm reply
While I hate to hear about anyone being laid off these days, I hope these folks see this as some kind of karmic justice for working for such a vile organization as the RIAA.
Do something better with your lives than working for a greedy org that sues everyone in its sights and treats e even its paying customers as criminals. Maybe you'll do better next time.
Not saying all corps aren't evil in their own way, but the RIAA holds a special evilness rank if you ask me.
nativeNYer
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Apr 2005
Squeal!
03/02, 03:55pm reply
Let's hear you squeal!
WiseWeasel
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Apr 1999
nativeNYer, might as well
03/03, 05:16am reply
be naiveNYer. If you think the RIAA's only function was suing file sharers then maybe it's time you did a little research. There are many musicians who support them, but not because of the file sharing suits.
bigpoppa206
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jun 2003