Printed from http://www.electronista.com

3.2-megapixel camera confirmed for next-gen iPhone?

updated 09:30 am EDT, Fri April 3, 2009

3.2MP camera for iPhone

The next iPhone should indeed have a 3.2-megapixel camera, according to a Taiwanese industry report. Market sources claim that OmniVision has received orders from Apple for 3.2-megapixel CMOS sensors, with the specific intent of use in a new iPhone line. Aptina and STMicroelectronics are also said to have been in competition to produce the sensors.

OmniVision is additionally noted to have secured a deal to produce five-megapixel sensors for Apple, though for what device is unclear; the end product is expected to launch later in 2009. Apple may theoretically use the sensors in a new iPhone or iPod, but the company is also said to be working on devices such as a 10-inch netbook, which could also take advantage of a camera. The technology could likewise be interwoven with Macs and Cinema Displays.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. Zanziboy

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2008

    +3

    Yay! Better photos..

    The iPhone will never replace my camera, but it would be nice to have improved resolution. I hope the new sensor has better light performance. I can't wait to see Omnivision's 5-megapixel sensor in an Apple mobile since it supports 1080p video and comes in 1/3" form factor for better image quality.

  1. Constable Odo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2007

    0

    Let the bitchin' begin

    What? Only 3.2MPs when my (any handset) has 5 or 8 MPs. It's an improvement and that will have to be satisfactory enough. A cellphone isn't going to take the place of a dedicated camera without extra bulk. Apple is making a sensible trade-off.

    I guess there's only going to be one camera on board and no video-conferencing. The high-end Nokia fans will be laughing hard about the iPhone still being behind the times.

  1. sgirard

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2005

    +4

    Autofocus

    Please have autofocus so that the iPhone can be used as a bar code scanner. Autofocus would open up all kinds of opportunities for application developers.

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +3

    sorry

    but you can't say something is 'confirmed' and stick a question mark at the end of the headline. It either is or isn't.

    And the 'sources' say both 3.2 and 5 mp. So what's the 5 for, if not the iphone?

  1. gambit-7

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2001

    +1

    obligatory:

    .... or for Apple's tablet.

    /shrugs

  1. sicembears

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2007

    -6

    PLEASE

    Something better than a 3 MP cam. That is sad.

  1. ZinkDifferent

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2005

    +2

    Apple products with video


    That's right, because the iPhone is the only product Apple makes with a video sensor (coughMacBooks, iSights, Cinema Displayscough).

    On a speculative level, a higher-resolution camera would fit well in a 30" Cinema Display, or a new iSight pod.

  1. shawnde

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2008

    +3

    Megapixels

    @Zanziboy and @sicembears

    Megapixels and Image Quality are inversely proportional, assuming the size of the sensor stays the same. Therefore, given the size of the iPhone camera and sensor (really tiny), they would be better off going to 1.2 Megapixel, and actually achieving better images than to 3.2.

    Remember, megapixels don't make good images; large sensors and large lenses do.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Asus Chromebook C300

When Chromebooks hit the market back in 2011, consumers didn't know what to do with them. The low-cost laptops, powered by Google's Ch ...

Plantronics BackBeat Pro Bluetooth headphones

Looking for a pair of headphones that can do everything a user requires is a task that can take some study. Trying to decide on in-ear ...

Lemur BlueDriver

"Oh no, the check engine light is on…again! What one of the hundreds of reasons could it be this time? Probably going to cost a fort ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News