House P2P bill to regulate browsers, FTP clients
updated 09:15 am EDT, Tue May 5, 2009
Strict P2P bill considered
A US House of Representatives hearing scheduled for later today will be devoted to deciding if a law should be made that requires peer-to-peer (P2P) programs to issue a specific notice to users that warns them that their files may be shared, CNET has reported. The Informed P2P User Act bill introduced in March by California Republican Mary Bono Back will be the focus of the hearing. The wording in the Act, which would require P2P software to allow file sharing only if two rules are met, could also apply to web browsers, FTP applications, IM programs and any other applications that send and receive files.
Under the proposed legislation, software that does not provide users with a "clear and conspicuous notice" of what it does and requires them to provide "informed consent" every time it is opened will be "unlawful."
All recent Microsoft Windows, Linux, and OS X operating systems would need to comply if the bill is passed, and launching a web browser would also require a "click to agree to terms and conditions" box. Such a restriction would potentially restrict the freedom afforded by the Internet; however, it's widely believed the bill, at least in its complete form, will not be passed through to become law due to challenges over its scope.




Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jan 2006
Will fail
This bill will fail as any other that would require users to click through warning screens EVERY time they start browser / p2p or ftp client. Not to mention there's no such thing as "unlawful software" and there's no penalty for using one. Will they try to prohibit the creation of such software? Forcing that on the rest of the world as well?
And what about Information Act? Doesn't it cover any case of sending info from your computer, including sharing files?