New FTC head sides with Google amid antitrust flak
updated 12:55 pm EDT, Wed May 13, 2009
FTC head sides with Google
The new chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, Jon Leibowitz, is sympathetic to Google despite the government body's investigation into antitrust concerns, a CSPAN interview has uncovered. While Google "certainly has a dominant position in search advertising," argues Leibowitz, "just having a dominant position doesn't in any way violate the law." Problems only arise when a company moves to exclude other competitors, as Microsoft did with Windows and Internet Explorer in the 1990s, according to the FTC head.
"If you get to a dominant position or a monopoly position by virtue of your own acumen, that's really the American way. We want to see that," he says. "I certainly don't see Google as abusing its power right now, no. And also it's brought many benefits to consumers."
The FTC has however been probing into whether ties are too close between the directorates of Google and Apple. Google CEO Eric Schmidt also sits on the Apple board, while Genentech CEO Arthur Levinson has a position with both of the other companies. Apple and Google are increasingly venturing into similar territory, producing technology such as web browsers, smartphone operating systems and paid digital videos.










Yep
05/13, 01:30pm reply
He's absolutely correct.
I've never seen any evidence of Google directly trying to harm competitors. Google seems to actually create interesting services and strives to improve them.
Microsoft is like an engorged tick embedded in the backside of... well... everything they touch.
JeffHarris
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Oct 1999
Open source
05/13, 01:39pm reply
And because a lot of the stuff they promote is open source, it's not as if they can lock people out on a whim.
dagamer34
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Apr 2007
Indeed
05/13, 01:57pm reply
I think a big part of it is just how the company chooses to act. Apple has a massively dominant position in the media player market but they'd hardly be comparable to Microsoft.
Salty
Professional Poster
Joined: Jul 2005
Funny Thing, That
05/13, 03:47pm (1 reply) reply
Microsoft in the 90s is a good example. Funny thing, though, that after being convicted of being a predatory monopoly, nothing actually HAPPENED to MS. Whoops.
As much as I'm not comfortable with Google owning the means of finding information on the web, period, you can't really accuse them of acting in a monopolistic manner about it--their product is just better, and that's why everyone uses it.
Makosuke
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Aug 2001