Comcast reportedly redirecting DNS traffic

updated 05:05 pm EDT, Tue June 9, 2009

 

Comcast DNS hijacking


An angry Comcast Internet subscriber has written a complaint (caution: may not be safe for work) that alleges the provider is intercepting his DNS requests to other, non-Comcast DNS servers and redirecting them to its own. The author says Comcast takes UDP traffic bound for port 53 on any server and redirects it to their own, making it nearly impossible for users to use different DNS servers, including their own.

Comcast has reportedly "hijacked" DNS requests in the past for nonexistent servers when users misspelled website addresses, for example, but if this latest accusation proves true, it would be a significant blow to net neutrality by favoring the provider's services over another's. Comcast is not alone in this practice, however.

The user does suggest a method of checking for whether or not the problem is present in users' own connections and even offers a solution, but it's intended for experienced individuals rather than average customers. Comcast has not responded to the accusations. [via Slashdot]


By Electronista Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :  

industry, networking, Comcast
toggle

Previous Comments

  1. andrewbw

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2001

    0

    epic fail, MacNN.

    If you read the Slashdot article, you'll see about 99 percent of respondents who tested their own connections saw no such blocking. Further discussion suggests the story was a plant to drive traffic (and therefore advertising impressions) to the original blog.


  1. Iritscen

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2009

    0

    Cynical much?

    I hate when people draw the most cynical conclusion possible. The /. poster readily admits that it might be a regional thing, in which case one would expect 99% of readers to not see that happening in their area.

    I think it's more worthwhile to mention that the blogger was unable to say whether it was Comcast doing the redirecting, or Earthlink. So it seems wrong to only name Comcast as the culprit, esp. when they've denied it vehemently (contrary to what this article says about them not having responded), and Earthlink has not commented on this at all (yet).


  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +1

    Re: cynical

    So it seems wrong to only name Comcast as the culprit, esp. when they've denied it vehemently

    Oh, Comcast has denied it vehemently. Well, we know they'd never lie. They're a cable company for goodness sakes.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

Sponsor

 
toggle

Popular News