Printed from

Thomas found guilty in federal retrial vs RIAA

updated 10:55 am EDT, Fri June 19, 2009

Thomas guilty in retrial

The long-standing legal battle between Jammie Thomas-Rasset and the Recording Industry Association of America closed another chapter, as the federal retrial found the defendant liable for willful copyright infringement, with the jury ordering her to pay a whopping $1.92 million in penalties. According to a Thursday Ars Technica report, the total damage award of $1.92 million was more than a $1.7 million increase from the amount awarded in the first trial. Thomas-Rasset was found to infringe on 24 copyrights held by the four major record labels, with each infringement costing the defendant $80,000.

The verdict and amount of damages came as a shock to both Thomas-Rasset and her lead lawyer, Kiwi Camara. Camara believed a guilty verdict would carry with it a minimum $750-per-song penalty. Thomas-Rasset said the RIAA is unlikely to collect the amount, however.

"Good luck trying to get it from me... it's like squeezing blood from a turnip," she said.

How strongly the RIAA and its lawyers will pursue the amount is also up in the air, as the campaign is already facing much criticism from the public for its practices.

A spokesperson for the industry association, Cara Duckworth, was at the trial and said RIAA is still willing to come to a settlement, though details on such an agreement were not forthcoming. Camara is aware of the settlement offer but said he is willing to file motions if his client wants to continue fighting. The defense can argue about the constitutionality on the amount of the damages and they have the option of filing an appeal. Thomas-Rasset herself has said the "war" between her and RIAA is not over, but did not clarify what that means exactly.

Camara intends to continue with his class-action lawsuit against RIAA that is based on the association allegedly violating federal anti-racketeering laws by pressuring the accused into settlements rather than face costly jury trials to defend themselves.

By Electronista Staff
Post tools:




  1. Flying Meat

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: Jan 2007



    That's gonna leave a mark.

    Seems ludicrously excessive to me, but hey!

  1. danviento

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2005



    It would be nice if there would be some judicial bottom to this pool of RIAA muck. After a bunch of appeals, perhaps this waste of time might actually turn something up: a definitive, logic look at how the DMCA can be realistically applied.

    I only question where you can find judges who have enough tech knowledge to interpret the Act, or send it back to the legislature to be better defined and less a friend of the RIAA.

  1. bigpoppa206

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2003


    Seems like the lawyer

    wants to keep fighting more than the client. PS: she was sharing over 1700 songs, the suit only needed to prove 24 of them.

    And it was a jury of her peers...!

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Linksys WRT1200AC Wi-Fi Router

Once upon a time, a brand-new Linksys router showed up on our doorstep. So we gathered some network-minded friends together, and hooke ...

Rapoo A300 Mini Bluetooth NFC Speaker

The Rapoo Bluetooth Mini NFC Speaker is a little metallic box about the size of a baseball. In spite of its small size, we were very p ...

Neurio Intelligent Home Monitor

The recently released Neurio Intelligent Home Monitor is a piece of hardware that, when integrated into a home's breaker box, monitors ...



Most Commented


Popular News