AT&T denies blocking Google Voice apps
updated 11:50 am EDT, Sat August 1, 2009
FCC probes Google app
AT&T on Saturday issued a brief initial response to Federal Communications Commission letters of inquiry sent to Apple, AT&T and Google on Friday regarding their roles in the rejection of Google Voice-enabled apps. Addressing concerns that it may have denied the apps to exclude a service that provides lower-cost long distance and SMS without using its data network, AT&T spokesman Brad Mays flatly denied any link between AT&T and decisions made by Apple as to which apps are allowed on the App Store, instead putting the responsibility on the iPhone maker. A larger response is said to be forthcoming.
"AT&T does not manage or approve applications for the App Store," Mays said. "We have received the letter and will, of course, respond to it."
The letters asked Apple and AT&T if the carrier pressed Apple into declining the recent Google voice app. The FCC also asked Google to explain Google Voice and detail which apps have been approved or denied in the past, such as Google Earth and Google Mobile App.
AT&T's statement contradicts its own stance on iPhone apps in the past. It was previously responsible for limiting SlingPlayer for iPhone to using Wi-Fi for streaming the feed from a remotely connected Slingbox. It was only released on the App Store after AT&T specifically modified its terms of service to exclude use of SlingPlayer over 3G on iPhones, calling them "personal computers" but not making a similar provision for BlackBerries and other similarly competitive handsets.
The letters are a part of a larger FCC investigation into the access to exclusive phones for rural customers when they aren't serviced by the relevant carriers in their areas.
To date, neither Apple nor Google have issued public responses to the FCC letters.
Typical for AT&T Point at
08/01, 12:49pm reply
Typical for AT&T to point the finger at the other guy.
In any case, Apple should reverse there decision as it wouldn't hurt there business and it would finally make texting free like it should have been all along.
b9robot
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Feb 2009
LIES!
08/01, 01:26pm reply
Follow the money. Apple wouldn't lose money from people using GV's features. AT
phillymjs
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jun 2000
iChat
08/01, 02:44pm reply
It could be that Apple is preparing a iChat version for the iPhone, maybe they are temporarily removed until after the update.
Peter Bonte
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Aug 2001
Google Voice s great
08/01, 03:00pm reply
But you still pay for receiving a text message, since it goes to your phone anyway.
ggirton
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Nov 1999
liars
08/01, 03:41pm reply
Read John Gruber's blog. Why would Apple care? The problem for AT
Le Flaneur
Mac Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 1999
Apple
08/01, 06:56pm reply
Apple is the company that ultimately made the decision. Does it make it better to argue that it was a result of AT&T's prompting? I think that's almost more ridiculous
luckyday
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Apr 2008
AT&T Ads
08/01, 08:03pm reply
Now we know that "More bars" means keeping people from options.
It certainly didn't mean reception.
dmsimmer
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Feb 2005
Skype
08/02, 04:50am reply
Not only SlingPlayer was hosed but let’s not forget the handcuffs put on Skype (by AT&T)!
CVB
cvbcvb
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Nov 2003
Can't stand them
08/02, 08:06am reply
AT&T is still up to its old tricks. They were a dishonest company when the government broke them up in the early 80s and they're still crooked. That's why I refuse to buy an iPhone until there's one from another carrier.
CmdrGampu
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Aug 2009
Yes and Yes
08/02, 11:59am reply
Seriously, Verizon as a company isn't any better. But, in my area at least, they seem to have better coverage. I know that AT&Ts is expanding/improving rapidly since the iPhone first came out.
There's a bigger story here and I'm really curious what it is. Is it possible that AT&T is having all these issues b/c of the rapid increase in data traffic since not only the intro of the iPhone, but also the general increased number of smart phones and wireless PC connects that seem to be the norm more and more? Has anyone put together any numbers on the type of traffic on individual carrier networks?
I'm bumping into more and more people with iPhones recently, it's starting to look like the number if iPods.
slider
Mac Elite
Joined: Oct 1999