Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Canada to force transparency in ISP throttling

updated 03:55 pm EDT, Wed October 21, 2009

CRTC issues net neutrality rules

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) today set groundwork for net neutrality in the country through a ruling that discourages Internet providers from throttling traffic. The guidelines will encourage monetary practices first, such as bandwidth caps or metered Internet access, and will accept slowing down some or all service only when necessary. All providers will also have to clearly publicize any throttling practices and give customers at least 30 days' notice, or 60 days' notice for wholesalers dependent on another Internet provider's network.

In its decision, the CRTC also says it will implement "special rules" to discourage providers from unfairly using throttling techniques to limit rivals. This and the 60-day notice are believed direct responses to outcries from smaller service providers who have complained that Bell Canada not only throttled their own service but gave them no notice in advance.

The decision mirrors calls from the FCC in the US to openly provide details but has already been criticized for effectively justifying some existing practices, such as Rogers' slowdowns of unencrypted BitTorrent traffic, without pushing for better justification. It also carries the risk of allowing larger providers to charge smaller ones not just for the access they already sell but also for the amount of bandwidth the smaller firm's customers might use. To date, neither Bell nor others are known to have used this double-charging practice. [via Globe and Mail]



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. charlituna

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2009

    -7

    comment title

    some won't like me for this opinion but I don't see that throttling and caps are a bad thing. nor is tiered rates. In fact I invite them both. with ISPs and with telecos. it is how they are handled that is the issue. if the levels are set high enough that the baby and the average users aren't effected but the folks doing things like 24/7 bittorrents and livewire might or are dinged, okay. cause that's why these limits are supposedly put in place. also i have an issue with the doers lying about it. if a company is setting such limits they should be forced to be upfront about it from day one.

  1. climacs

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: Sep 2001

    +7

    @charlituna

    you exhibit a touching but naive faith that the ISPs and telcos will do the right and reasonable thing, rather than cynically using throttling and caps in order to shake down subscribers.

    Remember, they wouldn't be wanting to do it if there wasn't money to be made in it.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Asus Chromebook C300

When Chromebooks hit the market back in 2011, consumers didn't know what to do with them. The low-cost laptops, powered by Google's Ch ...

Plantronics BackBeat Pro Bluetooth headphones

Looking for a pair of headphones that can do everything a user requires is a task that can take some study. Trying to decide on in-ear ...

Lemur BlueDriver

"Oh no, the check engine light is on…again! What one of the hundreds of reasons could it be this time? Probably going to cost a fort ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News