Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Sources: Apple rejected Intel Moorestown platform

updated 11:30 am EDT, Wed October 28, 2009

Apple may see future Atom as too hungry

Apple has flatly rejected Intel's Moorestown Atom platform for being too power-hungry, a rumor claims today. Unnamed industry contacts say Intel reportedly approached Apple on its own to suggest the ultra-mobile platform but that the Mac creator rejected it outright due to power concerns. According to the Fudzilla source, Apple needed idle power consumption about ten times lower than what Moorestown can manage.

While the reason for the rejection isn't stated in the apparent leak, Apple's requirements point to a handheld device and supports rumors that have circled around the company's anticipated decision to make an ARM-based tablet. While the tablet would be large enough to accommodate Moorestown's power draw at full speed, the nature of the device may lead to shorter battery life elsewhere, particularly in standby mode. Apple's buyout of PA Semiconductor last year is increasingly believed to have been done with hardware like the tablet in mind but should also lead to faster and more efficient ARM processors in smaller devices like the iPhone and iPod touch.

Moorestown is a major revision of Atom that consolidates the graphics and memory controller into an overall smaller, 45 nanometer processor codenamed Lincroft along with a companion system controller chip known as Langwell. In its initial design, it's not expected to reach any devices smaller than mobile Internet devices (MIDs) with 4-inch or larger screens and to have active battery life closer to a notebook than a smartphone. A shrunken 32nm version will improve energy use but may not be enough by itself.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    uh-oh

    Well, if you read it on fudzilla, it must be true.....

  1. Feathers

    Grizzled Veteran

    Joined: Oct 1999

    -3

    but...

    Will Apple actually pay those clever english gentlemen the ARM licensing fees or wait until they're taken to court?

  1. ff11

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2004

    +6

    re: but...

    probably depends on if the license costs an ARM and a leg

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Sound Blaster Roar Bluetooth speaker

There could very well be a new king of the hill for Bluetooth speakers, with Sound Blaster's recent entry into the marketplace. Bringi ...

Kenu Airframe Plus

Simple, stylish and effective, the Kenu Airframe + portable car mount is the latest addition to Kenu's lineup. Released earlier this y ...

Plantronics Rig Surround 7.1 headset

Trying to capture the true soundscape of video games can be a daunting task. Looking to surround-sound home theater options, users hav ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News