Senator's bill would bar cellphone ETF rate spikes
updated 04:10 pm EST, Tue November 10, 2009
Law forces VZ, others to keep ETF in check
Minnesota Democrat Senator Amy Klobuchar said on Monday that she will introduce a measure to prevent US cellular carriers from raising their early termination fees (ETFs) quickly. The move is a direct reaction to Verizon's decision to double ETF rates for "advanced devices" like the Droid to deter customers from exiting their service early. Klobuchar claims the rate hike has "little to no relation" to the cost of the phone and that it punishes those who depend on cellphones and have to quit for honest reasons, such as moving into regions that don't have coverage.
The Senator has written to both Verizon Wireless chief Lowell McAdam and FCC chairman Julius Genachowski to signal her intent. In the FCC letter, Klobuchar rejectes anti-regulation arguments by Verizon and other CTIA members, claming instead that the ETF jump is proof carriers will spike their rates when no one is monitoring their practices.
"Verizon Wireless' decision shows us once again that the wireless industry cannot police itself and will not, on its own, make its practices more competitive and consumer-friendly," she writes.
Verizon has responded that the ETF is prorated, as the fee drops $10 for each month of service, and also points to the contract-free price as an option. However, choosing this option raises the price of a Droid from $200 to $560, or more than it costs to simply abide by the contract and cancel later. Most carriers use the ETF as a means of guaranteeing the profit they would make from each subscriber that is lost when a customer quits before a certain point in time.
It's not clear when the bill will reach committee, but it comes as the FCC is about to debate wireless net neutrality that, if enacted, would prevent all US carriers from blocking legal apps and services.












nice idea
11/10, 04:30pm reply
but they'll just do what the credit card companies are doing... jack up the early termination fees before the law takes effect, should it pass.
climacs
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Sep 2001
Better idea
11/10, 06:40pm (1 reply) reply
Unless they add a retro clause to set it back to November 1 2009.
I have no problems with ETFs if and only if they drop to zero at the end of the contract period and if it's inline with the cost of the device.
I would almost rather have NO subsidies and lower the monthly rate.
Timon
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Mar 2009
Contact that senator to add on unlocking as well
11/10, 07:10pm (1 reply) reply
If you want to have official unlocking and sale of unlocked iPhones in the US, contact this senator or your own senator to include an amendment which would also force AT&T to sell unlocked iPhones and offer an official unlock through iTunes for iPhones which have been purchased at full price or for iPhones from contracts that have been completed in one manner or another.
aristotles
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2004
Still not enough
11/10, 07:53pm reply
Carriers should be forced to stipulate their cost for a device (the profit comes in from selling services (particularly SMS/MMS/Data) and that cost should be equally prorated over the course of a contract:
Example: a 600 phone on a 24mo contract should be prorated at $25mo - $50mo for 12mo
It's OBSCENE that they charge an ETF on a junk phone you can buy outright on a pre-pay plan for $20-30 if you're uninformed enough to select that phone on a contract plan.
SergioRS
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Sep 2004
Early termination fee...
11/11, 12:38am reply
If you are genuinely dissatisfied with your provider's service, there should be no termination fee.
- A
Fast iBook
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Mar 2003