Intel readying six-core, 3.33GHz Core i7

updated 03:20 pm EST, Tue December 15, 2009

 

Core i7-980X hints at 6-core Xeon too


Intel's first mainstream six-core processor should be fast across the board, a leak late Monday has given away. Built on the 32 nanometer Westmere process and part of the Gulftown architecture, the Core i7-980X will keep the Core i7 badge despite its two extra cores. At the same time, it will also maintain a high clock speed and should run at 3.33GHz, or the same speed as the current quad-core leader.

Level 3 ache has appropriately increased from 8MB to 12MB to cover the additional cores; the processor will likely be reserved for larger and higher-end desktops, however, as it should consume a high 130W of power at its thermal peak and is likely to cost the usual $999 bulk price Intel charges for every Extreme Edition processor. Intel is expected to ship the processor late in winter, most likely in March.

A second new Core i7 processor, the i7-930, is also believed due as soon as February. It will have only four cores and clock in at 2.8GHz with 8MB of L3 cache. Scaling back will nonetheless let Intel charge just $284 per chip in large batches.

The i7-980X is likely to be a strong indicator of Intel's plans for six-core Xeons using the same 32nm architecture and process; typically, Intel gives these similar or higher clock speeds as well as support for faster and error-corrected memory needed for workstations and servers.




By Electronista Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :  

Intel, computers, industry, Xeon, Core i7, Westmere, Gulftown
toggle

Previous Comments

  1. iphonerulez

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2008

    0

    Fantasizing over a dual six-core Mac Pro...

    I know I won't be able to afford one, but it's nice to think about how much performance it would have especially if there was a high-end multi-core GPU installed and Grand Central Dispatch tying everything together.


  1. lolcat789

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2009

    0

    Big deal

    Nobody uses 8 cores much less 12. This whole 'more cores is better' thing totally ignores the fact that most software doesn't use more than 4. If it does use more than four, any non-professional would likely be using a render farm and a pair of FireGL/Quadro's anyhow.

    Not to mention that extreme branding means $1,000 a piece... I'll wait for Thuban, thank you.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

Sponsor

 
toggle

Popular News