Android, Chrome outpace iPhone, Safari in web use

updated 07:55 pm EST, Fri January 1, 2010

Study shows Google catching Apple soon


Google's mobile and desktop web browsers had their best performance ever in December, NetApplications says in its latest study. Although Android still trails the iPhone in absolute share of the web with just 0.05 percent versus Apple's 0.44 percent, it grew a much faster 54.8 percent versus just 20.1 percent for Apple's platform. The BlackBerry too had a better month at 22.2 percent growth while the only major platforms below them are Symbian (19 percent growth) and Java ME (15.6 percent).

The holiday month also represented a major if symbolic victory for Chrome, which for the first time in the analysis has overtaken Safari for share on the web. The browser jumped exactly 0.7 points to 4.63 percent, or enough to pass Apple; even though it continued to grow, Safari grew only modestly versus November and topped out at 4.46 percent. Firefox saw a rare decline in use to 24.61 percent, while Internet Explorer continued its long descent and reached 62.69 percent.

While the rise of Chrome is explained through both the launch of Chrome for Mac in beta form as well as extensions becoming available for Windows, Android's efforts are more complex. It was helped both by a wider overall shift to mobile as well as the launch of key phones like the Motorola Droid that have fueled Android market share with runaway sales.

Proof of the downturn for desktop browsing comes through desktop operating system share. Despite sustained availability of Windows 7, Microsoft's combined OS share dropped to 92.21 percent while the Mac dropped a hundredth of a point to 92.11 percent. Linux was the only desktop platform to see a gain as it edged forward slightly to 1.02 percent. The iPod touch is broken out separately from iPhone share and claims 0.09 percent.

Android growth



Web browser share



Operating system share


By Electronista Staff

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. The Vicar

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2009

    +14

    Oh, come on.

    This is just as false as stories claiming Microsoft is in trouble because of Apple. Of course Google is gaining users quickly as a percentage -- they have almost none, so any jump is a huge percentage. If they only had ten users and managed to get fifty new ones, they grew by 500% -- but they're still smaller than Linux's desktop market share, let alone Apple's.


  1. Alan K

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +14

    Classic moronic use of statistics

    The article title is false.

    iPhone/Safari's share is 9 times as large as Android/Chrome

    Further, the net increase for Android/Chrome was 0.027% (54.8% growth on a 0.05% base), while the net increase for iPhone/Safari is 0.088% (20.1% growth on a 0.44% base).

    The correct article summary should be:

    -iPhone/Safari mobile web share was 9 times as large as Android/Chrome in Dec 2009
    -iPhone/Safari mobile web share gain was 3 times as large as Android/Chrome in Dec 2009

    I would fire the author of this article immediately and check his/her bank account for bribes from Google.

    I'm not an Apple fanboy; I just hate crappy math and worse writing.


  1. peter02l

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2009

    +6

    Who wrote this nonsense?

    Do you have any editors? What is this: "... Microsoft's combined OS share dropped to 92.21 percent while the Mac dropped a hundredth of a point to 92.11 percent."

    So Apple's OS share is just 0.1 percent less than Microsoft's? Not to mention that they should all add up to a hundred. The two fellows before me already called you on the junk math you use in this embarrassment of an article.


  1. PRoth

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2008

    +2

    Rough economy

    No joke, I'm in publishing and the first people a bunch of companies laid off in our neck of the woods, were copy editors and fact checkers... Mind you, I don't think Macnn ever had any of those to begin with... zing!


  1. Fast iBook

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2003

    +1

    Wow..

    Just..... wow.

    - A


  1. lkrupp

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2001

    +5

    Statistics...

    Statistics are just that, statistics. Data. It's how an individual or analyst uses and interprets that data makes or breaks the truth. Companies and individuals often use statistics for biased reasons. Google supporters will use this data to "prove" that Android and Chrome will take over the world. Then we have Steve Ballmer's famous "rounding error" statement regarding the iPhone. And, of course, we Apple lovers tend to reject any data that puts our favorite company in a bad light. Apple's success during the last decade makes it the perfect target for data mining. Nothing pleases the current culture more than to see a successful company or individual fail or be taken down. Heck, I'm still giddy over seeing General Motors assume room temperature. When Apple really does stub its toe, as it will eventually do, we will see an orgy of wagging tongues, finger pointing, and I-told-you-so pontificating.

    Unfortunately the web is now dominated by click w**** sights like MacNN who take data reports and add a certain twist to the headline in order to generate clicks and responses. Of course that means potentially more ad revenue so the cycle continues.


  1. cgc

    Mac Elite

    Joined: Mar 2003

    +1

    Growth from zero?

    The growth of Android and Chrome from a miniscule (0%) user base will be much greater in percentage points than the growth of the iPhone and Safari user base. Stop twisting the statistics to serve your point, take absolute numbers or compare the initial growth of iPhone to the initial growth of Android. That may also be a bad comparison because iPhone nearly created the high-end phone that could do everything. Android is riding on iPhone's shirt tails somewhat but the bottom line is the way the stats were presented is misrepresenting the truth.


  1. facebook_Mitchell

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +1

    yikes. . .

    I rarely bother to comment on web articles like this, but this one is so poorly conceived and written that it merits noticing. First, the stats used are meaningless given the actual realities of the situation re: Apple and Android. Second, the actual numbers used are clearly wrong (i.e., Apple and Windows can't both have over 90% of the OS share--and the correct #'s are included right in the chart--all the editor or author had to do was check the copy against the graphic).

    Really shoddy stuff. This kind of sloppy work makes me not want to click on future Electronista posts.


  1. chirpy22

    Junior Member

    Joined: Jan 2006

    +6

    BeOS

    Oh, BeOS, where are you, my love?


  1. Da Coyote

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2006

    -2

    Stats 101?

    Given the almost complete inability to understand basis stats (clearly noted by previous comments)...I respectfully suggest that the writers of that article be nominated for inclusion into the climate change Club O'Clowns.

    The sad part is that at least those mag writers probably got the sums correct - albeit sans any hint of interpretation. Not so for our change buds.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News