Microsoft refutes "clumsy" claim, points to end results
updated 06:35 pm EST, Thu February 4, 2010
MS PR says effect more important than problems
Microsoft corporate communications head Frank Shaw has quickly rejected former VP Dick Brass' assertions that the company is no longer innovative by citing examples of what Shaw views as success. The PR leader believes Microsoft should be seen by its "broad impact" and notes that, in spite of ClearType's delays, it's now on more than a billion PCs. Scale is more important than speed, he argues.
He sidesteps concerns about Office executives refusing to alter the main interface but does add that the OneNote memo taking app was designed for the Tablet PC platform.
The Xbox 360 is treated as a superior console for its early support of HD and social networking, although Shaw here also avoids touching on the actual point of contention, Microsoft's sales performance. Nintendo's Wii has regularly outsold the Xbox 360 since it launched a year later, in 2006. The Xbox's upcoming Project Natal is considered innovative but is widely regarded as a belated, if potentially superior, response to the Wii's inclusion of motion control from the outset.
No mention was made of plans to address qualms with Windows Mobile or the Zune, although the phone platform should be improved at Mobile World Congress this month.










ehh
02/04, 06:48pm reply
who really cares about what Microsoft says or does any more, it seems that Microsoft has slipped into irrelevance and that Google and Apple are now on everyones minds now
really who actually cares about Microsoft anymore?
flip2428
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jan 2010
It seems obvious to me that d*** Brass is right
02/04, 07:02pm reply
Hey Microsoft. It is very clear to me that d*** Brass is right and M$ is dead now. M$ is just surviving by inertia. It is a copycat company who never invented, created any thing that could inspire other companies or shine in the market. WIndows and Office are the only stuff that is keeping the company from vanishing forever.
LunarMoon
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jan 2008
What is wrong with the stupid censor?
02/04, 07:27pm reply
The executives name is d*** Brass. It is a fairly common short form of Richard.
aristotles
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2004
hilarious
02/04, 07:27pm reply
Sure, Microsoft Office wasn't modified to work properly on our Tablet OS, but we make a first class memo application for it! See, we can think outside the box when we need to. I'll bet nobody else would have thought of doing that!
nowwhatareyoulookingat
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jul 2009
The computer industry is always changing
02/04, 07:36pm (2 replies) reply
At one time the computer industry was dominated by IBM. Major competitors had names like NCR, Burroughs, Honeywell, and Univac.
Then mini-computers arrived on the scene. The leaders were DEC (Digital Equipment Corp), Data General, Prime, Wang, HP, and Sun Microsystems.
The Desktop PC took over with Microsoft leading the way. Compaq, Dell, Gateway, Acer, Toshiba, Sony, Apple, and a host of others were there. Most are still active.
The Internet, WiFi, and 3G mobility are changing everything once again. Apple has emerged from the personal computer pack to lead the charge. Google has been an overnight sensation.
Microsoft isn't dead and they're not irrelevant. They remind me of IBM -- still there and still important but no one should consider them an industry leader today.
davesmall
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Oct 2006
Inertia...
02/04, 07:38pm reply
A force quickly turning to molasses for them in this very snowy winter.
- A
Fast iBook
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Mar 2003
The me too guy!
02/04, 07:45pm reply
I agree with Flip2428. Who would have thought the Microsoft would become the irrelevant "me too" guy behind Apple and Google?
Feathers
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 1999
Shaw makes no points
02/04, 08:01pm (1 reply) reply
I read both posts and it seems that Shaw makes little sense and no points at all. Xbox has always been a loss leader for M$ and the entire entertainment division is mostly a failure. M$ spend time and money promoting HD DVD format that failed and the superior HD player is a PS3. The entire world is going HD and M$ is NOT the leader for any of this.
If Shaw wants to claim One Note is so great, he might want to take a look at Evernote and what they did to want started as an "open version" of One Note!
The fact remains is the profits M$ makes today is still from the 2 same products Windows and Office and both are quite challenged to be irrelevant in the future. Neither of these products show innovation today (if they ever did). M$ has been a "me too" copy machine company for many years. Few of their "own" technologies have been that profitable. In the past they were able to PUSH their products on users, but that is going away and so will they, if they don't change radically. Start with getting rid of Ballmer!
digiprod
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Sep 2007
Microsoft doesn't know it yet
02/04, 08:30pm (1 reply) reply
but it is already in its death spiral. The same kind of death spiral that GM entered some 30 years ago.
It starts with market domination.
Leading to absence of meaningful competition.
Which results in self-delusion that your products are world beaters.
Causing rejection of any proposals to significantly change, improve and update your product.
Which drives away the most talented and imaginative engineers.
Who then build products that are better than yours.
Which you cannot compete against because you've lost all dynamism and competitive skills.
Which makes your company unattractive to talented, imaginative people you hope to hire.
And so finally you die when your product gets so far behind the competition and people dump it.
aardman
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Nov 2009
great post but,
02/04, 08:39pm (2 replies) reply
Ya sure the UAW had no part in GM's demise?? ;-)
chotty
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jan 2003