Intel "Sandy Bridge" graphics to be twice as fast?
updated 05:10 pm EST, Fri February 5, 2010
Intel promises two-fold boost for Sandy Bridge
Intel has reportedly told its corporate customers that the Sandy Bridge CPUs with integrated graphics processors due for release at the end of the year will have vastly improved performance. While the chipmaker quotes a doubling of performance, it does not define what it compares it to, though it is most likely the existing Nehalem CPUs. Intel is otherwise being cryptic about the chips' performance, saying only that the chips have advanced media and graphics capabilities.
Sandy Bridge will feature integrated graphics on the same die as the CPU, with the two set on the company's first 32nm graphics core. With NVIDIA and ATI planning on introducing 28nm cores, it may also mean Intel is the only one in the industry with the 32nm chips.
A twofold improvement over Intel HD graphics found on Arrandale (mobile dual-core Nehalem) and Clarkdale (desktop) chipsets would be welcome, as the current design is capable of advanced media playback but often criticized for sluggish gaming. More likely, however, is a slight improvement compared to these chips.
Sandy Bridge will support 4GHz clock speeds, with scalable CPUs using up to eight cores. [via Fudzilla]











Sandy Bridge?
02/05, 08:24pm reply
Who cooks up these names at Intel?
Sandy Bridge sounds like a drag queen name.
Maybe they're not telling us something...
JeffHarris
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Oct 1999
Darn
02/05, 09:31pm reply
I was seriously thinking of getting a Mac Pro this summer. Now I guess I'll just wait for Mac Pros carrying Sandy Bridge CPUs.
rtamesis
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2000
comment title
02/06, 03:45pm reply
How will that be an improvement for Macs, when the nVidia 9400M was 5 times as fast as the current Intel integrated graphics offering?
saldin
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Feb 2010
Big deal
02/07, 10:35pm reply
ATI and nvidia have always been ahead of intel. Intel is just making noise, but cannot compete with what AMD has cooking up in the APU range.
I'll believe these claims when I see the proof.
lolcat789
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Sep 2009
no more intel integrated graphics, please
02/12, 04:47am reply
twice as fast still means slower than even the integrated solutions both nVidia and AMD/ATi are currently offering.
Kees
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Sep 2001