Suit accuses Philadelphia schools of spying on students

updated 01:25 pm EST, Fri February 19, 2010

Apple notebook webcams implicated


A new lawsuit accuses a Philadelphia school district of spying on high school students, according to the Associated Press. The Lower Merion School District provides some 2,300 notebooks to students at the Harriton and Lower Merion High Schools. The legal case is being brought on behalf of Blake Robbins, a student who was told by a Harriton assistant principal that a webcam caught him doing something inappropriate at home.

Since the assigned computers are MacBooks, district workers are believed to have been connecting to students' computers using Remote Desktop. District officials insist that they have only recorded still images -- both of users and their desktops -- in cases where a computer was reported lost or stolen. The Robbins incident may imply otherwise however, and various anecdotes from other students suggest that iSight cameras have been regularly switching on, though whether photos were being taken remains uncertain.

The district says it has now completely disabled its tracking system, but this may be unlikely to halt legal action. The suit makes charges of privacy and wiretapping violations, and could potentially gain class-action status. The district says it intends to fight for and win its defense.


By Electronista Staff

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. jwdsail

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2000

    +10

    LAWSUIT???

    The district is clearly in violation of federal wiretapping laws.. No lawsuit needed, send anyone remotely involved, all of them, to prison and make sure these idiots share cells with the biggest guys that have been in there the longest w/o conjugal visits!!! All a lawsuit will accomplish is making more lawyers richer and the district/taxpayers bankrupt.. Send these sorry SOBs to prison and throw away the key.




  1. njfuzzy

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2001

    +9

    Criminal not Civil

    I agree with the above post. This should be treated a criminal case, not a civil lawsuit.

    If the allegations are true, then privacy, wiretapping, and probably child pornography laws have all been systematically violated.

    This is incredibly creepy.


  1. mytdave

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2000

    +1

    what a mess

    I'd like to agree with jwdsail, but there's a few constitutional rights that would be trampled upon if you just sent those district wieners straight to jail...

    ...I don't think there is much of a gray area here. This is a clear invasion of privacy. Now, at the same time, the equipment does belong to the school district, so they have some leeway as to how the equipment is used, but using their equipment to eavesdrop (whether that be audio, video, text or picture) is definitely a privacy violation.

    What is acceptable is having users sign a usage-rules agreement which would include language letting users know up front that the log files of the computers will be analyzed to see how the computers are being used... so if you're using the school's computers to surf p*** at home, the log files, cookies, browser history, cache files, etc. will be used to detect violations of policy. All that is fine.

    What is not fine is remotely turning on a camera or microphone without the users' consent or knowledge. This violates wire tapping laws. In cases where the district has good evidence of a stolen laptop (like one being reported stolen), they should easily be able to obtain a warrant to engage the camera, microphone, or other recording/tracking devices to assist law enforcement in finding and arresting the thief.

    Do things the proper way, and there won't be problems like this, or at least not as many.


  1. jondesu

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2008

    0

    Another explanation?

    Is it possible that there's another explanation that wasn't included here yet? Perhaps the student had the webcam on, and it was seen by someone at the school, not via Remote Desktop, but via a website where they were broadcasting something. I think knowing all of the facts here would be a good plan.

    If indeed they were using the computer in the way implied, then yes, that's a violation of privacy. I just wonder if we're missing some of the facts here…

    jW


  1. wrenchy

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2009

    -8

    Isn't this

    how Steve Jobs spies on his subjects? Or it must be all the malware that was pre-installed the the Mac.

    Can't happen on my Linux box - because my webcam won't work! TAKE THAT APPLE :-)


  1. Paulrm

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -1

    Small problem

    If they are suing the Philadelphia system, they'll have a bit of a problem. Lower Merion is a separate town. Not part of Philadelphia at all.


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -8

    Re: Lawsuit

    The district is clearly in violation of federal wiretapping laws..

    Really? That's hard to believe, since they did not tap into any wires, nor is there anything that says they recorded any audio.

    Privacy laws are more spotty, since it all depends on someone's definition of privacy (and the way the supreme court is made up now, don't expect much in way of protections).


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -4

    and...

    This just goes to show you what happens when you just jump on the bandwagon ("I know what will improve our student's abilities! Laptops for everyone!" without looking at all the variables and such.


  1. Jonathan-Tanya

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2004

    -1

    what was inappropriate?

    What did the kid do that was inappropriate? Don't let our imaginations run wild.

    This is a serious, serious violation by the school board. Unfortunately, we don't live in a society that puts a stop to this type of thing.

    The school district will have unlimited funds to fight this, and issue an apology only after trying to do everything they can to hide it, cover it up, and deny it - which they do for one reason - because it usually works.


  1. Fast iBook

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2003

    +1

    Beyond...

    This goes so far beyond appropriate conduct i am lost for words.

    - A


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News