Printed from

Italy convicts Google execs over video, ignores safe harbor

updated 08:25 am EST, Wed February 24, 2010

Court says Google Video to blame for users

A Milan, Italy court today found three of four Google executives guilty for allegedly violating Italian privacy code through an upload to Google Video. David Drummond, Peter Fleischer and ex-employee George Reyes were held responsible for a 2006 incident in which Turin students uploaded video of them bullying an autistic student. None of the four, which included Arvind Desikan, were convicted of the direct criminal defamation charges also attached to the case.

Google says it plans to appeal the ruling. It argues that none of the executives were even aware of the video until it was removed and notes that the company took action to help identify the original uploader "within hours" of the clip becoming public.

The company and critics have also strongly objected to the accusations based on safe harbor principles. Google notes that a maintained verdict would render it and any other website legally responsible for any content uploaded no matter how little human observation is possible for new submissions. It also warns that European Union law specifically protects companies until they're made aware of illegal material and hints that Italy could be violating its EU membership terms through the decision.

If sites "are held responsible for vetting every single piece of content that is uploaded to them -- every piece of text, every photo, every file, every video -- then the Web as we know it will cease to exist," Google wrote. "many of the economic, social, political and technological benefits it brings could disappear."

The ruling would also likely have an impact on devices and software. Apps like iMovie, pocket camcorders like the Flip, and phones like the iPhone or most Android devices would likely face significant legal hurdles when used in Italy as Google would need to vet their content.

By Electronista Staff


  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001



    Who's privacy was violated? The people doing the act? The person who shot it? The autistic one?

    And does this mean that, say, one were to go to the beach and take a picture of their friend and post it, Google would be in trouble because all the people in the background are having their privacy violated?

  1. bdmarsh

    Junior Member

    Joined: Feb 2006


    re: and

    as long as you don't go to a beach in Italy, then you should be safe ;)

    In Italy, that is the precedent that is set with this trial. I expect the EU to put pressure on Italy, and that the appeal by Google succeeds in overturning the decision, especially when it could be applied to things like TV... better not show a crowd of people in any news reports in Italy without contacting every person involved.

  1. elroth

    Junior Member

    Joined: Jul 2006



    It's the autistic kid whose privacy was violated.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...

Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 (Android, 10.1-inch)

Lenovo is building a bigger name for itself year after year, including its devices expanding beyond desktop computers. The company's l ...

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, the process is not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often t ...



Most Commented


Popular News