Sony sued for pulling multi-OS support on PS3

updated 05:30 pm EDT, Thu April 29, 2010

Sony accused of deceit over PS3 OS features


Sony has been sued this week for removing the Linux install option from the first-generation PS3 in its latest firmware update. The class-action lawsuit filed on Tuesday argued that Sony broke its sales contract by taking out an advertised feature. The console maker lied to "millions of unsuspecting customers" by telling them they could install an OS only to remove the option in 3.21, the plaintiff Anthony Ventura said.

The change has led some to already hack the feature back in by using a mix of older firmware and using modified files. While successful, it would prevent players from joining others online or playing some games by checking for newer firmware.

He also accused Sony of ulterior motives. At the time, it had said the existence of the feature prompted "security concerns," but Ventura's lawsuit contended that Sony actually wanted to curb piracy. Installing Linux has previously given users access to the PS3's file system and the potential to get around copy protection systems. All slim PS3 models already go without the feature.

The lawsuit as a class-action would cover everyone who bought and kept a PS3 from the system's November 2006 launch through to the firmware's availability on March 27th of this year. Specific damages weren't requested but would go above $5 million. [via Eurogamer]


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. bigjimid

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2009

    -1

    What an idiot

    "...Ventura's lawsuit contended that Sony actually wanted to curb piracy."

    So he arguing that he should have the right to pirate media? Or is he arguing that it Sony's responsibility to provide him with a source to use his pirated material?


  1. cyn1c

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2008

    0

    No...

    He's arguing that Sony lied about why they stopped supporting multi-OS support. By saying it was pulled due to a "security issue" less people will complain than if it was about loss of profits. Either way, consumers are justified in being angry when functionality is removed from a purchased product. How would you feel if Apple stopped its Intel Macs from running Windows after you spent $4K on one?

    You should actually read the articles before extrapolating that someone is an idiot from a 200 word blurb.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News