FCC chair may backtrack on regulating net neutrality

updated 05:45 pm EDT, Mon May 3, 2010

FCC's Genachowski may reneg on neutrality promise


FCC chairman Julius Genachowski may turn on promises to enforce net neutrality in the US, insiders supposedly claimed on Monday. The contacts said the chief may now prefer to leave Internet access in its relatively deregulated state and avoid reclassifying broadband in a way that would 'burden' carriers and scare them away from building out their networks. He would mostly focus on changing administrative policies to give the FCC authority over at least some Internet service.

The change of heart alleged by the Washington Post would follow after a federal court shot down initial attempts to require net neutrality using only its existing mandate, which centered on a statement from former FCC chair Kevin Martin rather than an official rule. It's been hinted in the past that reclassification was on the table to require "common carriage."

Neither Genachowski nor other FCC officials have commented on the rumor, which is characterized as tentative since neither Genachowski nor others have committed to this strategy.

A decision in this direction would please carriers that have pushed for as little regulation as possible but would anger many telecom industry critics and current Genachowski supporters, either of which has hoped that he would implement more meaningful changes. Typical arguments have noted that, without common carriage rules, Internet providers have not only faced little competition from newcomers without their own networks but have sometimes been seen filtering or banning specific apps.

Comcast has abided by certain net neutrality principles in honoring its agreement with the FCC even after it was rendered invalid, but the lack of enforceable neutrality rules is often blamed for the cable provider's original decision to throttle and frequently block BitTorrent until it was caught in act after repeated public denials.


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

    Comment buried. Show
  1. mtnrunner2

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2009

    -12

    Good!

    Net neutrality is a terrible idea. It's like hijacking someone's living room by declaring it to be a common area for use by all. It's rights-viloating nonsense.

    The creators of Internet pipe should be able to use it how they see fit, including permitting or not permitting certain traffic.


  1. boris_cleto

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2002

    +7

    What a p****.

    The telcos have no intention of doing any more network building. The only way they are going to do more network building is if they are re-regulated and forced to do so.


  1. mqualben

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2001

    +5

    Not cool!

    SBC used to sue owners of sites using frames if the nav was in one of them (got a patent and felt all special). Sure...let the telcos write the rules--we wouldn't want anyone's rights violated! Do you think the free-market fairy is going to look out for what you want and protect you from abuse? Yeah, too much government is bad, but moderate regulation can be a good thing.


  1. ebeyer

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2004

    +2

    chicken..

    BUG..BUGBUGBUG..BUGAAK!


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News