NVIDIA hints webOS tablet, rags on Apple and Intel

updated 06:10 pm EDT, Mon May 24, 2010

NVIDIA believes Tegra can beat iPad and Atom


Outspoken NVIDIA chief Jen-Hsun Huang hinted in an interview today that a Tegra processor might power a webOS tablet. The executive called Palm's OS "fabulous" and strongly implied it was next for Tegra support after the recent addition of Android. He wouldn't commit to any official plans on the record with Laptop but said the only issue on phones like the Pre was the slow processor, which a multi-core Tegra would fix.

HP has emphasized repeatedly that webOS will be used on a tablet, but it has never said what sort of processor it would use other than the necessary ARM design. One possible tablet nicknamed the Hurricane could be ready as soon as the summer, in time to use NVIDIA's hardware.

Android phones should come out this year using the new Tegra hardware, the company founder added.

As expected, Huang was partly dismissive of the iPad, noting that it wasn't capable of Flash and couldn't show the regular web. He agreed HTML5 was part of the future but that companies like Apple couldn't simply make users "leap across a chasm." To the CEO, addressing Flash was primarily a matter of brute force graphics acceleration. He acknowledged that software-only rendering of Flash was slow but that NVIDIA's goal was to use hardware whenever possible.

"It just takes a lot of engineering," Huang said. "It is true that, us and Adobe -- and Adobe has been very open about this -- that in working with our engineers and in working with us over the last year or two, we've been able as partners to create a Flash experience that was optimized for GPUs. And because Flash is a visual media -- Flash has rendered graphics, it has video–running it on a GPU makes perfect sense. And if you just run Flash on a CPU, then it's a real hog. There's no question about it. Flash shouldn't be run a CPU."

Intel's new Atom Z600 was another non-factor as it came at mobile devices from the wrong direction. The new processor is a major reduction in power but is coming from the notebook-oriented x86 world where ARM was built for phones that consume well under a watt of energy. Dual-core Tegras are already faster, and Intel has yet to show that the reverse process of making a large processor small is effective.

"You could give an elephant a diet but it's still an elephant," he said.


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. facebook_Darryn

    Via Facebook

    Joined: May 2010

    +2

    The problem for Adobe however

    The problem for Adobe however is that Apple has given them all the frameworks to develop a Flash Player that uses GPU and Adobe refuses to use them because they want to retain control of the Flash Player instead of source it out to real programmers with talent. An Apple developed Flash Player would kill the PC version but that's what Adobe is afraid of.

    They've had 5 years to prove to Apple they want to be viable on the Mac but clearly they don't.


  1. spyintheskyuk

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2009

    0

    Common sense (partly) from a CEO

    At last someone I can totally agree with, at least on the point of Intel's approach. Trying to downgrade a powerful processor to match the advances of upgrading a small efficient one is never going to work below a certain level. Intel is finding that despite all the rhetoric from them just as Microsoft and their foolish adherents spouted off about the iPad using a small efficient OS that can grow with the technology over one designed for a desktop that no matter how it is cut down cant effectively be squeezed into a smaller form factor.

    Both are in danger of losing the war before they are able to offer a product that can meet even the most basic of those requirements. And by that time the opposition probably more than meets their capabilities anyway.


  1. Zanziboy

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2008

    0

    How silly!

    I love comments like "..the only issue on phones like the Pre was the slow processor..". No! It's the fact that the software was all in Java and could never run as efficiently as native code. THAT'S the problem. A faster CPU doesn't solve that problem because competitors with native code also have access to the faster CPU.

    Same logic applies to Flash. Throw enough processor and memory at Flash and it's great. Too bad about battery life and having a very hot phone in your hand (and against your head!).

    Hardware manufacturers shouldn't be apologist for bad software. It's obvious he doesn't know much about mobile software technology.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News