Text Size

Sprint Android 2.2 plans trigger outrage, highlight OS woes

updated 12:25 pm EDT, Fri June 25, 2010

Evo 4G and other Sprint phones reach 2.2 soon

Sprint today triggered controversy in confirming that it would have Android 2.2 on its network in the "near future." Details weren't given of which phones would have it, but it validated Adobe's slip that the Evo 4G would be one of those phones. A spokesperson for Sprint explicitly warned, however, that neither the HTC Hero nor the Samsung Moment would get the OS revamp.

No explanation was given by Sprint for the problems, prompting a hostile reaction from users who blamed the carrier itself for allegedly refusing to upgrade phones that are still very young and which they believe should have been capable of a newer Android build.

"This is absolutely ridiculous," one owner told Sprint on its update page. "Phones that are less than a year old will not get the update? I love Android devices, espcially HTC Android devices, but I refuse to drop $200+ a year on new phones, just because you guys don't want to free up the manpower to do the updates."

Some of the cause for the updates is likely to be HTC, which only said 2010 phones would be updated. As such, the only HTC phones on Sprint to carry Android 2.2 are likely to be the Evo 4G and possibly the Legend. Samsung hasn't explained any of its plans for the Moment, but the company has developed a pattern of declining to upgrade phones beyond one revision.

The decisions underscore a mounting problem of version fragmentation for the Android platform as a whole, which in the past year has seen phones that are just several months old locked out of even minor revisions. Hardware requirements have affected some early phones like the G1, but the issue has increasingly become one of phone developers either spending extra time with updates or refusing to invest the effort. Google has shown signs that it's bracing for the problem and not only plans to move more core features to upgradeable apps but may negate the need for custom UIs with improvements to Android 3.0.

The practice contrasts sharply with that of Apple, whose control of both the hardware and OS has let it not only push firmware upgrades as soon as they're ready but to offer them to an older range of hardware. Apple only this month began locking out iOS devices from upgrades as it said the first generations of the iPhone and iPod touch were too slow to handle iOS 4 properly.

 
Previous Comments

outrage!

06/25, 12:37pm reply

Especially since these users were promised continuous upgrades for years to come! Right? They were, weren't they? Oh, never mind....

testudo

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

0

upgrades

06/25, 12:39pm (1 reply) reply

As with any OS, it is up to the phone manufacturer to provide an upgrade. The only reason you have an iPhone upgrade is because Apple decides to deliver one. They could, just as easily, stop providing OS updates (or free OS updates) as they see fit. They also don't have any promises that your iPhone 4 will be able to run iOS 5.0.

testudo

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

-1

Non-custom UIs

06/25, 12:50pm reply

Anyone know if I'm right in thinking that you can always choose to run a newer version of Android *without* the custom UI? Of course, the Desire without the SenseUI is kind of a kludge, but if it came down to 'stick with 2.1' and 'run 3.0' then I'd probably take the risk...

jreades

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Feb 1999

-1

Well

06/25, 12:55pm reply

The good news is that both of those handsets have been rooted, so you can just install a cooked firmware release of 2.2, one that's likely to be better than the custom versions by HTC and Samsung in any case.

WiseWeasel

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Apr 1999

-1

Reaction...

06/25, 01:13pm reply

Will there be online petitions? Will there be a class action lawsuit? Will YouTube videos of outraged Android users crop up? Will the forums be lit up with furious posts in ALL CAPS? Will the threads grow to thousands of views and replies? Will stressed out users use terms like "I'm scared" and "I can't take this anymore!"?

Nope. That only happens when Apple is involved.

lkrupp

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: May 2001

+12

@ testudo

06/25, 01:29pm (1 reply) reply

"They could, just as easily, stop providing OS"

True. But let fact speak louder than could bes and should bes. Apple has updated every phone for free until this latest update when the original phone will be left behind. Android is mostly NOT upgrading its phones, even though it could possibly do so.

Fact......... wishes..... I do so love my iPhone 3Gs on iOS4. :-)

Just a thought,
en

Eldernorm

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Sep 2007

+13

Apple don't play that

06/25, 01:44pm reply

Apple's never going to release an OS update that won't work on a phone that's just a year or two old. Gimme a break. It's probably going to always be as aggressive as it is now: fully compatible with the latest phone, 90%+ compatible with the previous gen, and "mostly works but you're going to notice where it doesn't" for two gens back. (And iOS4 works great and has even made my 3GS faster.)

With this Android set up, this isn't gonna happen unless they make some changes and demands with their partners. With Apple, the iPhone is their only phone so they have more to lose if they play too much with upgrades; with carriers, they have a ton of other phones and have already made you the sale so updates are not their biggest priority.

And remember, Google's own Dan Morrill said fragmentation is a "bogeyman, a red herring, a story you tell to frighten junior developers."

joecab

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Apr 2004

+13

That means no Flash for those

06/25, 02:04pm reply

that just figured they'd have it to lord over iPhone users because they knew that "Android" would support Flash. No 2.2 upgrade, no Flash. Not being able to upgrade your smartphone within a year of purchase isn't a good policy at all. I guess I just assumed that any smartphone should be completely upgradeable within the two-year contract time. I'm not sure if that's possible since it could hinge on hardware leaps. If a new smartphone is introduced that has some advanced processor or graphics chip and the only way to take advantage of it would be an OS upgrade. Then the upgrade wouldn't even benefit the older model even if it was only a year old. With Android, new smartphones are out every other month, so older models could easily be orphaned within a year. Well, you choose your platform and take your chances.

iphonerulez

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Nov 2008

+9

@WiseWeasel

06/25, 02:07pm reply

No disagreement...but how many users are actually capable of doing this?

Android FTL!!

icewing

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: May 2008

+5

Thank you...

06/25, 04:32pm reply

For reminding us of the dangers of stepping outside of Apple's gates and then wrapping up your article by patting those of use, that stayed inside, on the head.

Integr8d

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Apr 2010

+1

Popular News