Apple settles with Minerva, gets sued by Emblaze

updated 09:55 am EDT, Fri July 30, 2010

Emblaze takes action on Apple after patent warning


Apple has been embroiled in two lawsuits in the past day, starting with a quietly negotiated deal settling a two-year-old lawsuit from Minerva. The two asked Eastern District of Texas Judge Charles Everingham to dismiss the case after privately reaching an agreement, the terms of which aren't known. Companies such as Minerva, which are billed as "patent trolls" since they make no products of their own, often hinge their businesses on either royalties on sales or large cash settlements.

Minerva had accused Apple in early 2008 of violating a patent it had just obtained for a "mobile entertainment and communication device in a palm-held size" that had a cellular connection and which could both download music as well as take photos. It alleged that the iPhone fit the description despite the patent having being granted over half a year after the iPhone first hit stores.

Simultaneously, Emblaze has acted on warnings to Apple and on Thursday sued the company for purportedly violating a media streaming patent. It has charged that the iPhone, iPod touch, Mac OS X and now the iPad copy Emblaze's technique of streaming without a dedicated server through their implementation of HTML live streaming. Microsoft has also been accused of similar violations through the IIS Smooth Streaming technique that underlies Silverlight.

Unlike Minerva, Emblaze has been involved in creating products and is best known for the Else Intuition touchscreen mobile OS; it focuses on media playback and one-handed use. The Israeli company was to have produced its own phone, the First Else, but killed the project after it didn't receive much interest in the hardware. [via TechCrunch]


By Electronista Staff

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Granting doesn't matter

    It alleged that the iPhone fit the description despite the patent having being granted over half a year after the iPhone first hit stores.

    The date a patent is granted is immaterial to whether there is violation. It's about when it was filed. In fact, the whole point of filing is to 'lock in' your invention while waiting for approval so no one else can 'steal' your idea and get something on market before you get your patent approved.


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    And...

    Glad to see Apple fighting against these patent trolls instead of just bending to their silly lawsuits!

    Oh, wait.....


  1. B9bot

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2008

    +3

    This should be outlawed, no product no patent!

    This should be outlawed, no product no patent!
    There should be no rewards for trolls who are to stupid to build what they supposedly invented.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News