Printed from

FCC chair: neutrality would trump any Google/Verizon pact

updated 03:35 pm EDT, Thu August 5, 2010

FCC says neutrality overrides Google, Verizon view

Any possible pact between Google and Verizon on Internet neutrality would have no effect on the FCC's policies, agency chairman Julius Genachowski declared today. When asked, he was adamant that net neutrality as seen by the FCC would remain intact. Genachowski wasn't clear on whether this would extend to wireless, whose fate is still undecided, but said it was important to preserve an even competitive field.

"Any outcome, any deal that doesn't preserve the freedom and openness of the Internet for consumers and entrepreneurs will be unacceptable," he claimed.

Google and its frequent Android partner have allegedly struck a deal that would preserve neutrality on landlines but abandon it on cellular links, giving Verizon the ability to charge more for certain kinds of content over its phone network and potentially the authority to block or throttle apps and services, including those that could compete with its own features.

The two companies accused of making the deal have so far been evasive in addressing the question. At the Techonomy conference on Wednesday, Google CEO Eric Schmidt didn't touch on specific talks and only said that the two companies had been chatting for a long time on neutrality as subject; he thought neutrality was important to avoid discriminating against companies but not for different types.

Verizon in an official statement didn't deny talks but said that an NYT article accusing it of wanting to charge extra for certain Internet content "fundamentally misunderstands our purpose" and that it wasn't making a business deal but rather advocating policies. It claimed to want an open, responsible Internet but wanted to curb regulation to "specific FCC authority, while maintaining investment and innovation." The carrier didn't directly challenge accusations that it was pressing Google to drop any calls for neutrality in wireless.

By Electronista Staff
Post tools:




  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001



    And who gets to define what a data network is? If you sign up for an email service for your blackberry, is the phone company violating neutrality by blocking internet access? Is the Kindle violating law because their data access is limited to download books?

    And will their neutrality rules, then, require that all traffic must be accepted, or can the company charge for the different types of traffic. For example, if you want streaming capabilities, you need to pay extra. If you want to torrent, you'll pay extra. if you want remote access, you need to pay extra? Is that against the law?

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, it's not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often touted as f ...

Moshi iVisor AG and XT for iPad Air 2

Have you ever tried to put in a screen protector that relies on static to cling to the screen? How many bubbles and wrinkles does it h ...

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 projector

Trying to find the perfect projector for a home theater can be tricky, as there are bountiful options on the market from a large numbe ...



Most Commented


Popular News