RIM: BlackBerry censorship is Internet censorship

updated 11:10 am EDT, Thu August 5, 2010

RIM hits back at BBerry bans as Lebanon joins in


RIM co-chief Mike Lazaridis in an interview late Wednesday struck back at imminent BlackBerry service bans by drawing the entire industry into the debate. The executive argued that attempts to ban the encrypted e-mail, messaging and web were part of a larger problem with Internet control as a whole and suggested India, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other countries were simply afraid of coping with modern communication. If it were possible to intercept BlackBerry data, it wouldn't stop the flow, according to Lazaridis.

"This is about the Internet," he argued to the WSJ. "Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off."

He went on to suggest ulterior motives for those calling for the bans, such as attempts to land political victories by claiming a tougher stance on security. Regardless, he still saw a chance at a solution if the governments were willing to participate in "rational discussion."

Despite the optimism, the situation was compounded on Thursday as Lebanon said it had its own concerns about the effect of BlackBerry services, of which security was one part. Indonesia denied rumors that it would follow Saudi Arabia or the UAE into partial or complete bans, but didn't rule out action. Kuwait has also expressed worry.

The combined bans could significantly curb RIM's market share as it tries to become less dependent on its core North American user base. While Saudi Arabia's ban only affects BlackBerry Messenger, restrictions elsewhere could force millions of customers to switch to competing smartphone platforms like Android and iPhone. UAE officials claim an alternative will be in place on the BlackBerry, but many may be trapped if their companies normally depend on BlackBerry services for work.

The week as a whole has been a setback for RIM. Outside of the launch of the BlackBerry Torch, it has primarily faced word of losses of business to competitors. The European Commission justified picking iPhone and Android over the BlackBerry by arguing that they were better matches in features, security and value.


By Electronista Staff

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. Fast iBook

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2003

    +4

    Hum...

    Hum... They want to open up private communications for "security reasons". Firstly, just no. Secondly, these people have no right to view these communications. As much as some wingnuts want to make the world a police state, it isn't going to happen.

    Maybe if these al-quaida sympathizing warlords focused more on quelling radical islam there wouldnt be a need for opening e-mails.

    - A


  1. Foe Hammer

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2005

    +3

    How Dare RIM ...

    ... try to draw the entire industry into a discussion and debate on what is clearly RIM's problem and RIM's alone to address (try wrapping a bumper around that, RIM.) :-) :-) :-)


  1. imactheknife

    Junior Member

    Joined: Jul 2003

    -8

    comment title

    have to agree with poster above....Suck it up Rim....retards in motion


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -4

    aha!

    This is all part of Apple's plan for world-wide dominance. Pay off world govt's to block the competitors from those markets!


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -1

    Surprising

    What is surprising is that the so-called law enforcement in the US hasn't pushed for more 'open' internet traffic.

    Then again, they all probably have the technology to read the encrypted communications and don't care.

    Like how the gov't mandates that all telecommunication services must have a way to tap phone calls.


  1. shawnde

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2008

    +1

    The Whole Internet ...

    I think these countries that do covert policing or filtering of the internet traffic, be it email, FaceBook, twitter, etc, should be banned all together from using the internet.

    I've suffered this first hand, as I was working in Dubai, where "half" of the internet didn't work, and the other half did. It was so ridiculous that their Proxy filter, would filter any page that had the words: "s**", "genitals", etc. .... even scientific sites. They also banned YouTube, FaceBook, etc. Just pure stupidity.

    I suggest that there should be a worldwide coalition which controls internet access and penetration, and any country which filters the internet (any segment or protocol) should be banned from using it all together. The internet is an "all or nothing" game; either you want to embrace the whole thing, or have none of it. This would put tremendous pressure on all these autocratic governments to back down, because there is hardly any nation in the world which would tolerate the lack of internet today (well maybe North Korea).


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Re: The Whole Internet ...

    I think these countries that do covert policing or filtering of the internet traffic, be it email, FaceBook, twitter, etc, should be banned all together from using the internet.

    Sure hope you're not in the US, since they'd be banned.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News