Microsoft bringing Mac support to Windows Home Server

updated 11:00 pm EDT, Mon August 16, 2010

Latest betas improve cross-platform compatibility


Microsoft is currently testing an updated version of its Windows Home Server software. The latest edition, which carries the code-name Vail, overcomes many of the compatibility limitations of previous versions. Users will be able to manage Mac systems alongside Windows machines in homes that utilize both platforms.

The company is also said to be adding Mac support to its Small Business Server software, known as Aurora. Aside from Mac compatibility, the updated version will focus on cloud-based features such as collaboration services.

Both the Windows Home Server and Small Business Server betas can be downloaded through Microsoft's Connect site. [via CNET]


By Electronista Staff

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. jpellino

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 1999

    +2

    The World's First Stay At Home Server?

    That would be a surprise to iTunes sharing, iPhoto sharing, AFP, Remote Access and Time Machine, all of which predated WHS.


  1. rvhernandez

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2005

    +1

    The Times....

    They are a changin'!


  1. chas_m

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +6

    Good

    I don't have any use for this at all, but it's bound to make some people's lives easier, so credit where credit is due.


  1. jarod

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2005

    -7

    They can Keep It!

    No self respecting Mac user would let anything MS on their network, let alone their home. That garbage belongs well - the trash.


  1. chefpastry

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: Nov 2005

    -1

    Don't understand

    I never understood the allure of Windows Home Server. From what I understand, it's a NAS that features something known as "selective redundancy", which, to me. means not all the data is protected by redundancy. That makes it a poor choice for backups (another touted feature).

    Am I missing something here?


  1. equitek

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2001

    +3

    AFP?

    I hope they're updating the AFP implementation Microsoft uses from the stone ages... The ancient AFP they use is really annoying!


  1. SwissMac

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2006

    +1

    Licencing costs...?

    And how many licences would be required I wonder? In a small office environment, SBS is too restrictive and the larger Windows server products have exorbitant licencing. They actually count users twice - once at the client and once at the server! Can you believe the greed that represents?


  1. DeezNutts

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2008

    +2

    Re: Don't understand


    Basically you select which shares or folders on the server you want mirrored on a second hard disk.

    I somewhat like this approach as it gives the user the ability to maximize disk space according to their needs vs. the entire server being mirrored.


  1. typesetterX

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2006

    +3

    Macs are friendly Windows clients

    We have several Microsoft servers and find our Mac clients (about 15% of all users) are actually more Windows-network friendly than our Windows desktops. Macs easily attach and are more stable.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News