Printed from

HTC claims Apple patents invalid in legal defense

updated 11:50 am EDT, Thu August 26, 2010

HTC says Apple patents violate prior art, more

HTC has filed a rejection (PDF) of the patent claims in Apple's main lawsuit. The rebuttal claims that the four patents violate rules regarding prior art as well as those for non-obviousness, originality and usefulness. Much of Apple's lawsuit is also targeting technology that HTC contracts out to third parties rather than anything created in-house.

Defenses of the sort are common but indicate HTC is honoring its pledge to fight the Apple case in a substantive way. The patent claims include heuristics on a touchscreen, slide-to-unlock gestures and power management. Apple also recently sued HTC a second time to incorporate patents for interfaces that change depending on the display configuration.

Regardless of legitimacy, many have interpreted Apple's lawsuits as part of a proxy fight against Google. Embroiling HTC in patent suits may slow down the largest single manufacturer of Android phones by forcing it to either change its technology or incur the costs of a settlement.

Apple hasn't commented on HTC's response, but it has put forward a motion (PDF) calling for at least the pre-trial portions of both the HTC cases and the defense against Nokia to be consolidated into a single procedure in a Delaware court. The iPhone maker has argued that as many as 11 patents face overlapping discovery processes in the case and that keeping the early phases separate would waste effort. As HTC and Nokia have argued for consolidated cases at the International Trade Commission, it would only be fair to unify the lawsuits as well, Apple said.

Most of the pre-trial phases involve Markman hearings, or sessions that determine what's meant by terms in a given patent. Defendants accused of patent violations will often try to interpret patents in Markman hearings in a way that invalidates some of the original claims. [via Groklaw]

By Electronista Staff
Post tools:




  1. Gazoobee

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Feb 2009


    fight the Apple case in a substantive way?

    The *only* defence HTC has is the "obviousness" one. The prior art can't be considered a substantive defence, because none of it was HTC's prior art.

    I see this as just backing up their stupidity and callousness with some empty bravado.

  1. Jonathan-Tanya

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2004



    That's just plain wrong, the prior art doesn't have to be HTCs prior art.

    A patent has a claim of originality. If it is not original, that's an important facet in the case.

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001


    Re: fight the Apple case in a substantive way?

    Substantive, as in "We're not just going to roll over and throw money at it because we think we're in the right!", as opposed to what most of these lawsuits want out of these things.

    You know, like how Apple paid off Creative over the iPod interface.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, it's not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often touted as f ...

Moshi iVisor AG and XT for iPad Air 2

Have you ever tried to put in a screen protector that relies on static to cling to the screen? How many bubbles and wrinkles does it h ...

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 projector

Trying to find the perfect projector for a home theater can be tricky, as there are bountiful options on the market from a large numbe ...



Most Commented


Popular News