Samsung Galaxy Tab should cost below $300 with US carriers

updated 10:35 pm EDT, Sun September 5, 2010

Samsung expects Galaxy Tab to get heavy US subsidy


Samsung in an update [sub. required] on the Galaxy Tab said the tablet's price would be below Apple's iPad when attached to a carrier. Although the full price may be significantly more expensive than the iPad -- $900 or more -- executive Hankil Yoon told the WSJ that the price would be no higher than $300 but likely above $200. Discussions are underway with US carriers, but Yoon wouldn't say which and expected the price to vary.

Previously, Germany was slated to be first with the Galaxy Tab with a launch in the middle of this month. Italy is part of the next wave, and many of Vodafone's European branches will have the Android hardware in October. Leaks have had a Verizon model coming, and one as yet unconfirmed rumor has a Sprint model with 4G coming in November.

The emphasis on carrier discounts is likely to be a calculated but risky strategy for Samsung. While it would superficially lower the cost of the Galaxy Tab to half that of a 3G iPad, which costs $629, the discount would likely require a contract locking users into two years of data whether they need it or not. On Verizon, a plan with a small 250MB per month would cost $40 per month, or $960 over two years. iPad owners pay more initially but only have to use service for a month at a time and can pay as little as $15.

Samsung is counting primarily on the more portable form factor, as well as front and back cameras, to sell shoppers on its tablet. Apple's feature set is more stripped down, but launched months earlier and is better for video and the web with a larger screen.


By Electronista Staff

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. facebook_Justin

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Sep 2010

    -8

    comment title

    Good name, suits it well. As in, theres a better chance of me leaving the Galaxy then buying a Samsung Galaxy!


  1. dimmer

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: Feb 2006

    +9

    And...

    "be below Apple's iPad when attached to a carrier"

    By this logic (as much as I hate to use that in this context) -- that's like having Apple giving you back a couple of grand if you do buy a 3G contract. That's so damn sad.

    I can't wait to see how iPad sales fall once people know that a crappy knockoff that doesn't work at all well but ties you in to a $4,000 contract becomes available! WooT!

    I see sales happening that make Kin look sw-e-e-t!


  1. lamewing

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2004

    +10

    Disappointed

    While I find the sarcasm unnecessary I do agree that Samsung is shooting itself in the foot by tying the Galaxy to a 2-year contract. I would love to get an android-based tablet instead of the iPad, but there is NO WAY I will buy one if it is connected to a contract.

    Having 3G service on an iPad without any contract is (too me) one of its greatest selling points. I hope these competitors realize that their shortsightedness and greed are going to destroy almost any chance of them selling their devices to U.S. consumers when the iPad is available sans contract.


  1. Jonathan-Tanya

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2004

    -1

    It's a very large phone

    When I heard you could use it as a phone - then I knew, it is a phone. Like the Dell Streak.

    Somwhere people have figured out it is a big no-no to call any larger device a phone - you call it a tablet.

    But really - smaller phones have tablet features, tablets that can be used as a phone - are just larger.

    It's very odd to hear Apple fan's bashing the carrier subsidy - I try to explain how expensive an iPhone is and people say $99 how is that expensive?

    And now - suddenly - in a different context, everyone understands that you pay for the device through the contract - I'm stunned.

    You are right, though, of course, you pay a lot through the contract, but the only thing worse, is paying a lot through the contract, and not even getting the subsidy.

    On AT&T, with iPad, you are supposed to pay for BOTH your iPhone contract, and an EXTRA amount on a no-contract monthly basis for your iPad - and you get NO discount from the carrier for having done that - at least on the iPad device.

    The Galaxy Tab is a phone replacement - if you aren't lookign for that, there will be many other Android Tablets - but this particular one, is a phone replacement and as such, isn't going to be a huge seller, they are targetting only 100,000 per month, which is a very modest amount from a company that is selling 1 million per month in Galaxy S class phones.


  1. aristotles

    Grizzled Veteran

    Joined: Jul 2004

    +7

    Large phone replacement?

    Speaking of fanboys, Jonathan you are doing a great spin job for Samsung. Who in their right mind would want a "large phone", especially on contract? Are you going to hold it up to your ear?


  1. Alfiejr

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2008

    +4

    Hopeless

    half the size of an iPad - and for media/entertainment, size matters.

    twice the size of a iPod touch - and for complete portability, size matters.

    plus a two year contract! doesn't Samsung grasp that we all HATE those contracts? but of course without telcos, Samsung has no retail network, just discount stores like Best Buy.

    no doubt some good number of Android fans will buy. but after that it has no market.


  1. Jeronimo2000

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Here's the joke: it ISN'T a large phone

    I just watched the video on http://www.spiegel.de/video/video-1082294.html (in German) where they gave a quick preview of - as the previewer calls it multiple times - "this... thing".

    The funny part is: not only would it look stupid to hold it up to one's ear to use it as a phone - you just CAN'T do it this way, as there is no speaker at the top and the mic is on the upper left of the case. You are bound to use a headset.

    That's one sweet iPad killer! :-)


  1. Salty

    Professional Poster

    Joined: Jul 2005

    0

    I know one person this would be good for...

    I know one person... and only one person this would be good for haha. I have a friend who keeps saying he wants something big that he can browse the web on and just happen to use as a phone. To be honest, in some ways I wonder if I wouldn't mind it all that much, if you kept a Bluetooth headset with you, or if you had headphones it wouldn't be so bad, I always use my iPhone headphones with my phone I rarely use the built in speaker.

    At the same time my one friend isn't exactly typical.

    Either way, tying a device to a 3G contract is just stupid if it's not a phone. I might get an iPad one of these days, but I'll get the WiFi model, and Apple will still make tons of money off me buying apps for the thing. Sorry Samsung... you failed this time... I won't be getting a Galaxy Tab to match my Samsung monitor, printer, AC, and soon TV.

    I'd have seriously considered one of these just to play with Android, but not at the cost of a monthly contract.


  1. vasic

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2005

    +1

    Confusion, confusion!

    This device will come with a full voice+data plan (i.e. starting at $70, at least). For iPad, the pay-as-you-go data-only plan starts at $15. Obviously, with the Samsung device, you can make phone calls, while with the iPad, the closest to reasonable phone functionality is Skype (clunky, I know). However, I'd like to find out how many phone calls are Samsung device users going to make on their device. More importantly, will they be giving up their ordinary cell phone lines, once they get the Samsung device. If not, then their monthly plan is at least $100 (vs. $15, or $25 for the iPad). The difference between the two plans is $660 per year (without an additional cell line, and $1,070 with an additional cell line). I would say, getting an iPad is significantly cheaper than the Samsung device, no matter how you slice it.


  1. vasic

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2005

    0

    Another way to look at it

    Ordinary subsidy for a dumbphone is around $200. For a smartphone, it is usually closer to $400. This makes Samsung device actual price somewhere around $700, if not even higher. Pretty expensive, considering that you're forced into buying a voice plan which you will find very difficult to use.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News