Rogers mulls charging extra for data quality on smartphones

updated 03:10 pm EST, Wed November 24, 2010

Rogers considering data priority plan for phones


(Updated with Rogers response) Canadian carrier Rogers is considering a plan that would let it charge extra to give quality 3G service in the event its cell towers are overloaded, Electronista readers have learned. The company is asking some customers how they would react to a feature, tentatively called the Data Priority Service, that would prioritize a subscriber's data packets over others for a monthly fee. It would help guarantee important or real-time data that would otherwise be choked off, the company said.

The plan isn't certain to appear at all and doesn't have definite details were it to come into being, although Rogers has floated charging up to $10 for the privilege, according to those who have been asked. Nothing has been mentioned of Bell, Telus or newcomers like Wind Mobile trying a similar move so far.

A strategy of the sort hasn't been tested in earnest in North America and could draw controversy. Cellular network congestion has been a mounting problem with the rise of the iPhone, Android and other smartphones, and carriers have complained about the cost of upgrading their networks to cope with the added demand. AT&T has been the most prominent example and has spent hundreds of millions of dollars adding capacity and extra nodes, especially in iPhone hotbeds like New York City and the San Francisco Bay Area.

Critics, however, have attacked data priority plans for effectively punishing users who can't afford or are unwilling to pay to be placed ahead of others. Such strategies have also been chastised as attempts to delay necessary network upgrades in problem areas by letting those who would be most vocal about congestion pay for an "out" without addressing real issues for the wider user base. Rogers typically hasn't had network congestion near the level of AT&T.

Update: A Rogers spokesman has provided a statement reflecting the uncertainty of the proposal and that it won't necessarily be implemented.

"We don't comment on rumours, but I can say that at Rogers we always design our products and services with the customer in mind," he said. "As a result, we test many concepts and ideas with our customers. Sometimes we're actually considering launching these ideas, but often we're just testing concepts. Many of the ideas we test never get launched based on customer feedback."


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. facebook_Chris

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Nov 2010

    +9

    Feh!

    Maybe they should do something about their legendarily crappy customer service quality first. What a pack of jokers.


  1. Sondjata

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2000

    +12

    brilliant

    Instead of you know, building out infrastructure We'll just charge our customers more.


  1. Geoduck

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +4

    Another checkmark

    on the list of reasons I'm dropping Rogers. That they would even think about this rather than making their system work better is typical of what I've come to expect from Rogers. Just 30 more days and I get to go into the Rogers store, drop the phone on the counter and tell them to stick it somewhere warm.


  1. jones948

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2007

    +3

    Creating more of a problem

    If more and more people signed up for this, they'd have to reserve more room for their priority customers, making a bad situation worse for those that don't pay.


  1. Flying Meat

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2007

    +3

    And don't forget the slippery slope!

    Why would companies be excluded from such a deal, and where is your net neutrality?


  1. facebook_Dale

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Nov 2010

    -6

    We are doing this now for a lot of services.

    Need a kidney transplant fast, pay more at the hospital.
    Need your car fixed faster after a crash, you can buy insurance for that.
    Need a cop at your house do to home robbery, pay for a rent-a-cop.
    Need to see better TV, pay for HD.

    So you see from my short list above, we are already paying for better service.




  1. leonpro

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2004

    +3

    This is stupid.

    I took that survey yesterday and told them it was a money-grabbing feature that should simply be provided to their subscribers.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News