Google starts sandboxing Flash in Chromium; Chrome soon

updated 09:30 am EST, Thu December 2, 2010

 

Google sandboxes Flash in Chrome for Windows first


Google late Wednesday revealed that it has acted on its longstanding promise to sandbox Flash in its web browser. Starting with the open-source Chromium version for Windows, Adobe's plugin will block off access to certain vital parts of the browser code to prevent some if not most security exploits. Although not mentioned, it should also reduce the likelihood of Flash crashing the browser by preventing it from affecting more vital parts of the app.

The search firm didn't say when it would port the sandboxing to the Mac or to Chrome. Builds of Chromium are often used as testbeds for developers shortly before they reach semi- and fully stable versions of Chrome.

Other browsers have already been sandboxing Flash both for security and stability reasons. Apple was one of the first, starting with Safari, but has since been followed by newer versions of Firefox. The plugin has been preinstalled in Chrome for months, although the need to isolate it has been somewhat reduced since Chrome was already running each browser tab as a separate process and sandboxing both certain HTML and JavaScript, limiting the effect of a Flash security hole compared to other platforms.


By Electronista Staff

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +4

    um

    Shouldn't that be done for all plugins, not just flash?


  1. leamanc

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2003

    +6

    Re: um

    No, only for Flash, because nothing sucks like Flash does. Unless it's another plugin for an Adobe product. Make plans to start sandboxing that PDF plugin, browser makers...


  1. andrewbw

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2001

    -6

    Actually...

    The quicktime plugin is particularly buggy as well, and combined with Internet Exploder on Windows, accounts for more exploits than Flash.

    Oops, wait, this is MacNN -- gotta tow the party line.

    FLASH BAD! BAD, FLASH, BAD!


  1. beb

    Mac Elite

    Joined: Jan 2002

    -2

    Chrome for iOS

    Can we have Chrome for iOS then? Chrome is based on Webkit anyway. I have both Macs and Windows boxes and I use it for both. It just plain works well. If Google is going to take on the extra work of sandboxing Flash anyway, having it for my iPad would be awesome.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

Sponsor

 
toggle

Popular News