Intel starts netbook, tablet group to fend off iPad, Android

updated 12:50 pm EST, Wed December 8, 2010

Intel begins netbook and tablet group


Intel today confirmed that it has started up a dedicated network and tablet group in what's likely an attempt to counter the iPad and a slew of other ARM tablets. The group will be lead by the leader of the company's embedded chip and communications team, Doug Davis. It should help "sharpen our focus [at Intel]" on the newer categories, company spokesman Bill Kircos told the New York Times.

He explained that the total shipments of netbooks since their 2007 inception was about to top 100 million and it was about time to gauge the demand for Intel-based tablets and hybrids like the Inspiron Duo.

The semiconductor giant has already swung its attention to tablets with the upcoming launch of the Oak Trail platform for Atoms, but until now it had been grouped under regular mobile processor efforts. It was designed to use a smaller footprint and consume less power than existing Atom chips, especially when idle. Earlier efforts have usually struggled Companies have already tried pure-touch Atom tablets like the Slate 500, but the processors have consumed too much battery life and have left them often having five hours or less of useful runtime where an iPad can last for 10 and even a Galaxy Tab lasts for seven.

Creating a group signals an insecurity in the category, reflected earlier in a CEO mission statement leaked out earlier this year. Intel reaped rewards from the netbook rush but now risks a netbook backlash as PC builders are reportedly lowering their netbook estimates to accommodate sales lost to tablets as well as a lack of major performance updates. The first true wave of mainstream tablets using Intel also won't show until early 2011 at the earliest and will often use Windows, creating little difference compared to a netbook.

MeeGo, a tablet-friendly OS developed with Nokia's help, won't be ready in earnest until later on.

Early successes from Apple and Samsung in tablets have been credited to using ARM-based processors and mobile operating systems from the start. Apart from longer battery life, they allow for much lighter and thinner designs. Most ARM cores also have graphics cores that can outperform Intel's usually very slow video and play HD video without needing a companion chip.


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. Foe Hammer

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2005

    +6

    Just What We Need

    A slew of 5-year late rev. 1 products from a company that's not known for designing operating systems, software and user interfaces.

    How about making some chips that are better suited to these devices and sparing us the IntPad and the IntPhone? (Or better yet: the 'telPhone.)


  1. dwoodruff

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2006

    +4

    wow

    Starts?

    Isn't it a bit late to the game?


  1. facebook_David

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Dec 2010

    -2

    WTF

    I can see a lot of switching to AMD in the near future because of this misguided attempt by a chip manufacturer to compete with its customers. The guy pictured here looks like he's dressed in n*** casual attire - but don't want to judge a buk (Yiddish for idiot) by its cover.


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -3

    Idiots

    Not Intel, you all.

    If you could read/comprehend or just use your minds, you'd realize they ARE NOT starting up a line of tablets to be sold. They are creating a group to focus on the tablet market. You know, make chips and chipsets with the intention of being used in tablets and the like.

    Otherwise, the chip maker might find itself losing out to some of the other small-chip makers dealing with ARM-style chips.

    Oh, but, no, why bother realizing that is what they are doing. Nah, much more fun to berate them based on reading a headline!


  1. Peter Bonte

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +1

    ARM vs Intel

    Its to late already, there mobile 'Medfield' chipset will be late to the party and not compatible with current software. The first products are planned late 2011, sorry, to little to late unless its ARM compatible.


  1. Bobfozz

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2008

    +2

    Intel didn't count on...

    companies such as Apple inventing their own chip sets for their nonMac line. When Grove was around he would've been on top of that. Too much "me too" stuff going around, not enough INVENTING anymore except by rebels.


  1. icewing

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2008

    +1

    What MacNN needs

    Is there any way to block all posts by testy?


  1. BlueGonzo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2010

    +2

    Intel...

    get a ARM license! But wait, you already got one with Xscale but sold it to Marvell.


  1. Spieguh

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2010

    +2

    Industry

    This is the kind of innovation we all expect from an industry-leading company. Way to be on the cutting edge of technology, Intel!

    By the way, I was being sarcastic.


  1. Foe Hammer

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2005

    +2

    Testy's Awfully ... Uh ... Testy Today, Isn't He/S

    Rumors of Apple tablets have been around for how many years? Formal announcement of the iPad was how many months ago? The iPad has been shipping for how many months? So Apple must have started designing chips for it how long ago?

    Intel was aware of the Apple tablet rumors for how many years? Intel watched the formal announcement of the iPad how many months ago? Intel's been able to buy iPads to dissect for how many months? So Intel's going to start designing chips for the tablet space in earnest ... today?

    Intel's only hope may very well be to become its own best customer when it comes to tablets. And just in case you think that's dumb, testy, remember: it worked for Apple. Then again, Apple was known for its operating systems, software and user interfaces beforehand. But that's OK. Intel can just sell its chips to all the wannabes. Nothing impresses more than your souped up hardware running someone else's crappy software really fast. [cough] [cough] [cough] windows [cough] [cough] [cough] [cough] [cough] [cough]


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News