US Army may issue Android, iPhone to troops

updated 12:20 pm EST, Tue December 14, 2010

US Army talks Android, iPhone, iPad for soldiers


The US Army's Capabilities Integration Center's head Lt. Gen. Michael Vane today said the military is planning to issue smartphones to combat soldiers that could improve their abilities to work out in the field. The Army at a minimum will have Common Access Card readers like those for notebooks on the iPhone in January and on Android in April, letting either check their e-mail and calendars with security intact. Future upgrades should let them see live positions on the battlefield and get intelligence in real time, USA Today was told in an interview.

The armed forces branch is already testing it out in safe conditions, such as postings at domestic bases, in garrisons and at schools. A test in Fort Bliss, Texas is also providing an early simulation of how it would work in combat conditions. One brigade is getting a full test as part of a modernization program that could even include tablets like the iPad, e-readers like the Kindle or Nook and pico projectors.

Most of the current challenges focus on encrypting the messages, as most of the trials were conducted without protected signals. Phones would also need to be ruggedized, although this would more likely involve cases rather than any direct modifications.

The devices themselves would likely be completely subsidized, including the phone bills, but may not necessarily lock soldiers into a particular device. They may instead get an allowance both to buy the phone of their choice and to cover the associated costs.

Google has had relatively little involvement with the US military in deploying hardware, but Apple has talked directly and has been part of some of the earliest experiments.


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. climacs

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2001

    +12

    "INCOMING!"

    "Hold on, I'm updating my Facebook status!"


  1. mr100percent

    Junior Member

    Joined: Dec 1999

    -2

    A card reader?

    Did I read it right? They're gonna add a cardreader to an iPhone?


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +1

    Re: A card reader

    You do realize Apple has added credit card readers to iPhones, right?

    Probably an add-on type reader to snap on the back.


  1. psdenno

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2003

    +1

    I would think.......

    ....it would be a HUGE security risk - especially the "Future upgrades should let them see live positions on the battlefield and get intelligence in real time" part of the package. Sounds more like a recruiting ploy. Join the Army and get this FREE iPhone!

    Hopefully, people smarter than me have got the whole process figured out. However, having spent 20 years in the military, I have some doubts.


  1. climacs

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2001

    +5

    in a related story

    US Army psyops plans to airdrop thousands of Kin phones to the enemy. "We got a really good price on them at Big Lots!" said an Army procurement officer.


  1. Inkling

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2006

    0

    Ruggedized and Milspec?

    Maybe this means we will eventually see a ruggedized, water-resistant, and even Milspec iPhone on the market. Quite a few commercial and amateur radio gear is now built to meet military specifications. There's no reason Apple can't do the same with an iPhone. An iPhone that's a bit heavier and bulkier is far better than one that's no longer working because it was dropped or got caught in a downpour.


  1. tortenteufel

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2007

    0

    better

    use silent mode


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -3

    Re: Ruggedized and Milspec?

    There's no reason Apple can't do the same with an iPhone. An iPhone that's a bit heavier and bulkier is far better than one that's no longer working because it was dropped or got caught in a downpour.


    Sorry, but that's not the Apple way. Adding too many options, choices, etc. Adding costs to production by having multiple product lines. Apple prefers the simplistic and easy "one model fits all" approach.

    Thus the same reason you've not seen any of what you're dreaming about in Macs or iPods, either.


  1. Inkling

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2006

    0

    Droids not iDevices

    They'll need to go with Android phones. Apple's iOS is too closed and its hardware line way too woefully limited.

    Given its huge market share, Apple should have created line of iPhones and iPod touches, including a ruggedized (and perhaps milspec) iPhone at least two years ago. They'd have made bucket loads of money with them.

    But Apple isn't that market savvy. Steve Jobs wants to be able to put Apple's entire product line on a single Keynote slide. For iPhones, for instance, there is the New Phone (currently the iPhone 4) and the Old but Still Sold Phone (iPhone 3GS). That's all and that's pitiful.

    Desktops are even worse. Apple doesn't even make a desktop in the most popular form factor in other OSs. And its clueless marketing team, wonders why desktop sales are so anemic in comparison to laptops. Duh! Give the public what it wants and it will buy.


  1. Inkling

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2006

    0

    The real issue

    Someone has posted: "Sorry, but that's not the Apple way. Adding too many options, choices, etc. Adding costs to production by having multiple product lines."

    First, Apple's production has already scaled well past the point where it is saving them money to have a single, highly promoted iPhone. That's not an issue. If anything, having a single product in such high demand creates supply issues that can raise costs and create complications.

    Second, this is actually a stupid business policy, one more suited to the Apple of the About to Die Era of the mid-1990s than today. Multiple, overlapping product lines allow you to have multiple production facilities, offering protection when a major disruption affects one facility or its supply chain.

    Third and most important, multiple products provide market redundancy. If one product proves to have a flaw that makes it a poor choice, customers can shift to a different product rather than to competitors. The antenna issue for the iPhone 4 could have reached that point. Missing a change in the market is also less likely when you have multiple products. It's very foolish to point to a products success as a reason not to market something different. Think of the once-hot RAZR cell phones.

    In short, having one iPhone (the iPhone 4) or one consumer desktop (the iMac) is a bit like running an airline whose passenger aircraft have only one engine. There's no healthy redundancy, no backup in the case of a failure either in product design or market demand. Any significant mistake can become a major disaster.

    That's what you get when you have a business run by one's man's ego rather than a team with well-established business experience and expertise. For an illustration, look at what is now being said about the decline of RIM and the once high-riding Blackberries. It failed to anticipate change and develop a new line of products to deal with that change. Precisely the same thing could happen to Apple.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News