Intel exec: Microsoft tablet optimized OS has taken too long

updated 05:45 pm EST, Sat January 8, 2011

More on MS ‘Jupiter’ and Windows 8


An Intel exec, apparently stung by Microsoft’s CES announcement that it is developing a version of Windows for ARM-based architecture, has spoken out to reveal that Intel had been pushing Microsoft to develop a tablet optimized OS for some time. "Hey, we tried to get [Microsoft] to do a tablet OS (operating system) for a long time. Us, and others like Dell," said Intel exec Tom Kilroy, when speaking to CNET. Kilroy went on to explain that Intel is developing Atom processors for Android, Windows 7 and the MeeGo platforms, which will be powered by single-core versions of its Oak Trail architecture in power sensitive devices.

ARM-based chips are major challenge for Intel as they have become the ubiquitous chip of choice for mobile phones and tablet devices because of their relative processing performance and battery life. By contrast, Intel’s Atom-based chips have been by-passed by the latest generation of mobile operating systems, as they cannot compete with ARM chips especially from a power consumption perspective. Intel sold its Xscale ARM-based chip holdings to Marvell Technology in 2006 when it made the decision to pursue the Atom architecture instead. It is also likely that as the ARM architecture develops, it will soon begin appearing in low end netbook-like devices, putting further pressure on Intel.

In related news, more information has come to light regarding Microsoft’s plans for Windows 8. Mary Jo Foley of ZDNet has learnt that Microsoft’s new application model for Windows 8, codenamed ‘Jupiter’ will be a new user interface (UI) library for Windows. It is expected to be a lightweight XAML/UI layer that sits atop application programming interfaces and frameworks for UI graphics, text and input. Microsoft hopes that the development platform will revitalize app development for Windows and help to deliver more appealing and immersive apps.

While the code layer is being developed specifically for Windows 8, it is thought that the framework could be adapted to other versions of Windows, including those like Windows Embedded that run on tablet devices. Microsoft has also indicated that Windows 8 will be scalable and will be able to run on tablet devices. However, it said something similar with regard to Windows 7 and after the debacle that was its CES 2010 pre-emptive ‘slate PC’ announcement made by MS CEO Steve Ballmer, it has still to develop a feasible response to Apple’s domination of the tablet space since early 2010.

Tablets such as the HP Slate and others running Windows 7 have struggled to gain and traction in the market as, while the OS has multi-touch capabilities, it is not optimized for the form factor, and the devices are hamstrung by comparatively poor battery performance with ARM-based tablets running a tablet optimized OS. [via CNET and via ZDNet]


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. climacs

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2001

    +9

    hmph

    as the story points out... Intel missed the boat on ARM, so this is just lame fingerpointing.

    I expect Microsoft to be a total non-innovator... surprising that Intel missed the boat as well.

    further proof that the desktop PC paradigm is dying and hopefully Microsoft with it.


  1. facebook_Matt

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Jan 2011

    -4

    The reverse sounds more like it...

    With the power envelope of Intel's Atom being ~12W at full load vs something like a Tegra 2's which is ~1W, I think Microsoft wasn't satisfied with Intel's performance-per-watt.

    Something like Windows phone 7 could be easily adapted for an iPad-style consumer tablet. For the enterprise/work customers who already use Windows machines, a $200-$500 solution that is 100% compatible with the existing hardware and software already in use makes Windows ARM a more logical choice. Nobody needs to retrain office workers, they just upgrade systems and reduce overhead (reduced power consumption).


  1. thebiggfrogg

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2007

    -1

    Ballmer to Intel:

    Pull my finger.
    Guess they did and guess they got what you'd expect from Ballmer and Microsoft. Pffffffffffffffftt! I'd hate to be around for that.
    Zoinks!!!


  1. thebiggfrogg

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2007

    -1

    Kilroy

    was there.
    Zoinks!!!


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News